- Thread starter
- #3,841
The chick will be a leaky Sumatra cross pseudo Brown Red.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's pretty.The chick will be a leaky Sumatra cross pseudo Brown Red.
View attachment 3546114
View attachment 3546116
Oh those are pretty. I love when that coloring pops up in my flockThe chick will be a leaky Sumatra cross pseudo Brown Red.
View attachment 3546114
View attachment 3546116
Mom and chickIt sounds to me like the WTB is heterozygous dominant white instead of splash and the chick inherited dominant white from her. Pictures of her and her chick would help to confirm.![]()
My understanding is that recessive white dilutes shank color, although in the epidermis, making for lighter colored shanks, with lighter, or transparent scales covering the legs which can be darker in the dermal layer, same thing with dominant white . Mottling supposedly does the same thing, as does Bl, B, and maybe other plumage colors to different degrees. Hence you can have an E/E chicken with all the melanizer genes and you won't ever see a black shanked white chicken. Getting blue legs in a white bird is about as dark as you can get, and it lightens as the bird ages. The main gene determining shank color are the ones for dermal melanin and skin color. I created some white birds on black backgrounds (E/E) with dominant white and they all had dark legs, but a lot lighter than those without. Even with fibromelanosis genes, the recessive white silkie has lighter legs, lighter than the paint, with one domnant white gene, but homozygous for white have lighter than the paint.White Ameraucana have dark Slate/Blue Shanks. Recessive white based on the c allele has no effect on shank color
View attachment 3544963