- Feb 9, 2009
- 2,595
- 75
- 296
Thanks, Tammy. Roo #2 kept bothering me, ie, too short. So you're saying he isn't necessarily too short backed but the tail is. Therefore, I assume, you prefer Roo #1. Am I correct? Most of the other roos are longer in the back/tail or more like Roo #1. There are just too many roos and part of them must be go. How long or old do you think they need to be to look like what they will be as adults?
Thanks for the help!
No. They need to have a longer back going up on an angle flowing into the tail seamlessly. Not a flat back then tail
Last edited: