Yes, there were two other birds entered, both frankly, too young to be in the show.I agree with you that the proportions of the two depictions are not exactly the same so you have to adjust your eye for that. The 1915 SOP is an artist rendition where the artist can illustrate a standing bird perfectly. I trust the APA Judge got this right because he could handle the bird & feel the body underneath the feathers. There was at least one other breeder who showed Buckeyes at the show, Isn't that true, Laura? A good judge will go back and forth sometimes between two birds, handling them, feeling the differences -- you can only tell so much from a photo! Adjusting for the proportions, Laura's bird has the same overall shape as the 1915 SOP illustration.
When you actually see most Buckeyes in person, you will note their backs slope properly (slightly down toward the tail). Most photos do not convey the same. I have seen some photos of good birds that looks like their backs flip up. I suspect Laura's bird's back slopes slightly down. The back angles are NOT a problem area for the breed (although one would think looking at some of the photos).
I like seeing my birds in molt because I can see their shape really good and can see all the angles properly.
I will say I was pleased with the judge's comment to me afterwards. He walked over to where I was sitting with friends and said "I would have made that Buckeye CH American but he's just a little too young. He'll be in good shape for Columbus."
I think he will...

Last edited by a moderator: