Announcement The Coop Page / Article Rating & Review Project!

[Kiki]

More great progress. Here are the stats:

View attachment 1449839

View attachment 1449841

These are stats for just 'coop' pages correct?

 

[Nifty-Chicken]

These are stats for just 'coop' pages correct?

The first query is only for articles in one of the main coop size categories

The second query is unfortunately not limited to just coop articles (that's beyond my database-joining-query skills), but it is limited to ratings made since starting the project.

 

[Kiki]

The first query is only for articles in one of the main coop size categories

The second query is unfortunately not limited to just coop articles (that's beyond my database-joining-query skills), but it is limited to ratings made since starting the project.

Hmm...why do I have a trophy for rating 150 articles then?
Something isn't right.

NEVERMIND The red part answers my question.

 

[Nifty-Chicken]

A quick reminder about HOW we want you to rate coop articles:

Regarding rating criteria, try not to rate a coop page only on the way the coop looks. A 5-Star coop page is one that is incredibly detailed and chock-full of stuff that will help others build their perfectly fitting coop, and usually has a great combo of:

• A bunch of pics during and after construction
• A nice write-up of what the person did, what they liked, what they would have done differently, tips, tricks, etc.
• Plans of the coop are a big bonus!

So, to clarify, you're not rating the coop itself, but the helpfulness of the page (pictures, details, info, etc.)

 

[BlackHackle]

A quick reminder about HOW we want you to rate coop articles:

Regarding rating criteria, try not to rate a coop page only on the way the coop looks. A 5-Star coop page is one that is incredibly detailed and chock-full of stuff that will help others build their perfectly fitting coop, and usually has a great combo of:

• A bunch of pics during and after construction
• A nice write-up of what the person did, what they liked, what they would have done differently, tips, tricks, etc.
• Plans of the coop are a big bonus!

So, to clarify, you're not rating the coop itself, but the helpfulness of the page (pictures, details, info, etc.)

Yup! That's what I'm doing. I first run through the coop and its setup, then I judge the page

 

[21hens-incharge]

I am running into several coops that the pictures are all missing.
I am noting it in my review but not sure if that's the best way.
I also have seen a couple that give me the message of not having permission to view.

 

[Kiki]

I am running into several coops that the pictures are all missing.
I am noting it in my review but not sure if that's the best way.
I also have seen a couple that give me the message of not having permission to view.

Send me a link to these please! (the missing picture ones)
Pm is fine.

The not having permission to view just ignore.

 

[casportpony]

I am running into several coops that the pictures are all missing.
I am noting it in my review but not sure if that's the best way.
I also have seen a couple that give me the message of not having permission to view.

Can you send me the links to those?

 

[Kiki]

Friends!
If you happen to run across an article that is missing pictures please feel free to send a link to @casportpony or me.

 

[BlackHackle]

Friends!
If you happen to run across an article that is missing pictures please feel free to send a link to @casportpony or me.

I ran into a couple...I'll send the next one I meet