You must admit that you notice 80% of the coop pages were created or last edited in 2012Owners come back.
I write about two to three sentences. The first is a comment on the coop, the second is about the coop page, and the third is things that could be added to both
You must admit that you notice 80% of the coop pages were created or last edited in 2012
I write about two to three sentences. The first is a comment on the coop, the second is about the coop page, and the third is things that could be added to both
There were changes in 2012. One of those changes was a push for coop pages.
If I remember right......
Yup I was a long time lurker.
That explains the great abundance of coop pages to rate
Yeah, I totally get that, but it's good practice to be as objective as possible. I've definitely seen some ratings (from before this project) that gave pages that should have been a 1 or 2 a 4-star review.
Yup, that's definitely a good idea / option. I've done the same before.
YES! please feel comfortable only doing the rating. To be honest, I'd probably just default to having peeps give quick (accurate) ratings on these older coop pages vs. writing reviews... unless there's blatant "WOW, THIS IS AMAZING" or "Ugh, here's a blatant thing that needs fixing" comments that would be helpful.
Yup! In 2012 we converted from a very clunky articles system (it was pretty bad) to a new system... but in the process all the old articles were imported with the "creation date" of the day they were created.
Good point. I also struggled with separating my opinion of a good looking coop with an informative and detailed article. After rereading this thread I have a better grasp lol.
Quit your job already!
There's almost 3000 you can do!
