- Thread starter
- #8,461
Yep...I've never seen a man in my family kill a chicken...that's woman's work.
LJ, the way you describe your grandmother is exactly the kind of women I've been raised by and who I've become. There is never a day that killing an animal won't affect me...it always has and always will and I guess that's because I'm a woman, with all that being a woman entails...we are the softer side of this world.
But...there's feeling bad about it... and then there's carrying that baggage with you all your days, refusing to set it down. I think that divides the masses...those who see the dirty job, know it's going to really bite to have to do it, and then they push up their sleeves and get it done. Once the blood is washed away and food is in the jar or freezer, then the job ends. They put that heartache to rest.
The other side of the masses are those who carry that job around the rest of their lives, dreading it each time it comes around again because it has been such a weight on their hearts since the last time. Wisdom would tell one to put that job down after it's done but there seems to be a disconnect somewhere....maybe folks feel like they are more compassionate if they carry that heartache all the time? Maybe feeling the hurt of it assuages their guilt over the necessity of killing? Or maybe we've gotten so far away from killing our own food as being a necessity that they feel guilty because it's really no longer necessary? One can just go to the store and buy the meat and most folks have the money to do that now, so it kind of takes away the necessity and the survival mode that gets most poor folk through the killing.
I think that's the dividing line, most likely. Folks who depend on the meat...and I mean really depend on it...have learned to that it's necessary to put that guilt down if they want to enjoy the taste of their food. So generations of that kind of thinking has trained us to not carry that load. I think that's been to our advantage. It's not that we don't hurt when we kill, it's that we refuse to hurt every day over one day's job. One day of misery is enough.

But...there's feeling bad about it... and then there's carrying that baggage with you all your days, refusing to set it down. I think that divides the masses...those who see the dirty job, know it's going to really bite to have to do it, and then they push up their sleeves and get it done. Once the blood is washed away and food is in the jar or freezer, then the job ends. They put that heartache to rest.
The other side of the masses are those who carry that job around the rest of their lives, dreading it each time it comes around again because it has been such a weight on their hearts since the last time. Wisdom would tell one to put that job down after it's done but there seems to be a disconnect somewhere....maybe folks feel like they are more compassionate if they carry that heartache all the time? Maybe feeling the hurt of it assuages their guilt over the necessity of killing? Or maybe we've gotten so far away from killing our own food as being a necessity that they feel guilty because it's really no longer necessary? One can just go to the store and buy the meat and most folks have the money to do that now, so it kind of takes away the necessity and the survival mode that gets most poor folk through the killing.
I think that's the dividing line, most likely. Folks who depend on the meat...and I mean really depend on it...have learned to that it's necessary to put that guilt down if they want to enjoy the taste of their food. So generations of that kind of thinking has trained us to not carry that load. I think that's been to our advantage. It's not that we don't hurt when we kill, it's that we refuse to hurt every day over one day's job. One day of misery is enough.