Why offer him something that has no chance of succeeding and take away the hospice care that my mom needed?
Oooops. I goofed. See next post.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why offer him something that has no chance of succeeding and take away the hospice care that my mom needed?
Why offer him something that has no chance of succeeding and take away the hospice care that my mom needed?
My father died of MS complications so I understand what you were going through.7 Biddies, I am not against the process, just against it in this particular case. It was obvious that my dad did not have long to live and they needed hospice care more than participating in a trial. Like I said, he didn't even get the first treatment. I understand that they have to start with terminal patients, but if you are trying to treat someone so close to dying then how are you going to know if the drug is working? Even if he had lived another week and had made it through the first treatment, there is no way anything would have extended his life at that point. He really was that close. I am not a doctor and I knew that. You only had to look at him to know that. It made me angry that his doctor didn't consider the reprecussions of offering this "life saver" to him. She put no thought into how my mom was going to help him get to the bathroom or to the car to get to appointments. She wears a leg brace and uses canes to walk.
ronott, he died where he wanted to die, at home. They made it through that week OK it just would have been a little better if my mom could have had help. He didn't want to die in the hospital. In fact he ran a fever over 101 for most of a month and refused to go to the hospital. I asked him why he wouldn't go to the hospital one day and he said "because people die in hospitals." I am a firm believer that people have the right to die with dignity and to chose the where if they can (not talking about suicide here, just end of life choices). In the end, he was home and he was relatively pain free. Other than that, I guess you can't ask for too much more when the time comes. Just wish he could still be here. He was relatively young (only 64) and I miss talking to him from time to time. We used to talk about once a week. He was a computer geek to the extreme, and half the time I didn't understand what he was talking about but I wasn't close to him when I was growing up so having that connection as adults was precious to me.
Very kind words and thank you.
Cynthia, my heart goes out to you. That is tragic. I had a German Shepard who got a rare agressive cancer. We got his tumor lazered off and gave him some meds. He was like a puppy again for a month ot two then got worse then before. He was near 11 but he was heslthy as a horse. Well before the cancer. Had to take him to be put down...seeing the life go out of him was horrible...but to not expect the death and witness it? That must be far worse... I have a Dachshund... best dog I have ever had.he is my bestt friend... I often find myself having conversations and dressing him up. We snuggle and do almost everything together. I can't imagine him gone....with Doxies their little backe are prone to have inverted discs.. He is a little over a year old. We know a main cause for doxxie back probs are over weight weinies. So he is kept at a good weight. Try to minimize the jumping off of stuff but it is hard tostop him. I am hoping he is like my fiends dachshund and live problem free. But I fear he might have problems in the future... I want to get him treated, but I juet thinkbof the pain he will have to suffer, when sugery, recovery, and the chance of it happening again. Also the funds to pay fo his surgery. As I know it is expensive. I would like to think If I put him down after his back goes out so he doesnt have to suffer that. But often think How that would be bad ownership. ...also loowing him ould devestate me.

7 Biddies, I am not against the process, just against it in this particular case. It was obvious that my dad did not have long to live and they needed hospice care more than participating in a trial. Like I said, he didn't even get the first treatment. I understand that they have to start with terminal patients, but if you are trying to treat someone so close to dying then how are you going to know if the drug is working? Even if he had lived another week and had made it through the first treatment, there is no way anything would have extended his life at that point. He really was that close. I am not a doctor and I knew that. You only had to look at him to know that. It made me angry that his doctor didn't consider the reprecussions of offering this "life saver" to him. She put no thought into how my mom was going to help him get to the bathroom or to the car to get to appointments. She wears a leg brace and uses canes to walk.