The Olive-Egger thread!

Quote:
KoroSeaWallikiki.jpg

The ancestor of Ameraucana and the Quechua originated in the South Pacific cultivated- created by cultures, mostly extinct now. These people never came into contact with that KFC gene stock until they were introduced in the 19th century. Consequently, the ancient stocks are largely extinct now. There may only be a few hundred left in the entire world. The Ameraucana and the Easter Egger -as well as most Quechua have already been thoroughly contaminated with Mediterranean chicken breed genes. We can't afford to further compromise these stocks- especial as conservationists work furiously trying to repair the stocks. Its akin to having someone track mud into the kitchen after you've mopped it- or worse- while you're in the middle of it. Selectionists are in the process of recreating ancient stock using molecular data.


I don't think of anything bred at someone's farm or in their back yard as a mutt necessarily. Each and every one of us is a steward of the stock that we purchase and think of as our own. The hatcheries are stewards of stock that have been in someone's family- the family that owns that hatchery for instance for many generations- many decades -someone has been holding onto that stock for hundreds of years or at least half a century in the case of the Ameraucana/Easter Egger.

I'm not just stating that the North American Araucana is rare. I'm asserting the fact that whomever sold it to you carried that stock next to their bosoms for a very long while and they select bred that stock. Whomever they received that stock from did the same. It's not a terrible sin to dip into those genes and use to create NEW heirloom strains that may one day become New Heritage breeds. What is unforgivable in my book is to create through selective breeding Anything that could be mistaken for a North American Araucana and sold as such.

Again, what if someone decided to take a dozen eggs they've purchased from you and hatched them for a local elementary school?
The chicks get too big and too stinky too quickly. It then becomes the responsibility of the school secretary or one of the better moms of the school to find homes for those birds. Sooner or later some of it ends up at a local farmer's market - the person that picks that stock up tires of it and unloads it at a tailgate swap meet. Some of those birds look all the world like North American Araucana. Most people don't know the difference between a duck and goose so please don't pretend that a dusky olive egg is going to change anyone's mind about what the buyer WANTS them to be.


The underlying issue here is genetic contamination. We mustn't let the tufted rumpless olive egg producer ever breed with the North American Araucana or the Argentinian/Chilean Collonca de Aretes that is is descended from. Why? Because it's nearly extinct!
The risk is too great. Every person that buys a bird feels that it belongs to them. The villagers of Bolivia and Chile didn't feel that way. That stock had been with their people for countless generations. It belonged to their people, their family, their communities. Once the Spaniards came and took that cultural identity from them and introduced European chicken breeds- bigger and better- all that was was for all intensive purposes was lost.

The same is true for the peasants of Marans France, the villagers of Welsumer and so on.

The stocks were all composites- they were created through crossing of available strains and breeds and even races- or hybrids with wild junglefowl.
But the people could ill afford to have people haphazardly crossing stock that could end up being bred back to parental stock.
That's all I'm trying to get at here.

Someone wrote rather obtusely, "isn't this the olive egger thread?" Hello? Anyone invested in this endeavor to produce olive eggers owes something to the stewards of the straight bred stocks of both the dark egg layers and blue egg producers. What they owe is respect and honour.
We don't own our livestock. It belongs to our grandchildrens' grandchildren.

All we need is one global pandemic that wipes out three quarters of the world's chickens as the rainforests of south east Asia are felled and the junglefowl hunted to extinction- by both guns and domestic chicken diseases I might add.

In the eventuality that this happens local strains of fowl from every village in Asia and South America are destroyed to ostensibly contain the disease (created inadvertently by the industrial poultry industry)- we will all have to start again. We need to conserve each thread of lineage each stock-
I've stated earlier and will reiterate again- the KFC fowl are genetically over-represented. There are millions upon millions- actually BILLIONS of industrial chickens and their commercial chicken progenitors in existence right now. There are very few maybe a few hundred of the rare stock being raised in all the world. Do you want to be held accountable for helping to eliminate these ancient strains?
Have hobbyists even taken the time to learn anything useful about the intrinsic value- the genetic and cultural history of the stock they intend to amalgamate?

Its an issue of ethics.

Please do produce an olive egg and make educated decisions about it. I'm personally excited about the generation of New Heritage breeds like these heirlooms that you are creating. I'm only reacting to the issue of selecting (by back crossing naturally, which generates countless culls) for traits of rare and endangered races of breeds that we could never hope to bring back. It's disrespectful to the poultiers right here in the USA and even more of an injury to the indigenous cultures of the world- it illustrates how little we honour or appreciate their contributions to the world.

Naturally these are over-caffeinated opinions- please don't over react to them.
 
Last edited:
I don't see why you are trying to start a fight and get this thread locked Resolution. Normally I have a lot of respect for your teaching threads but you're being rather trollish here. No one in this thread is breeding anything other than birds who lay consistent OLIVE eggs. Not blue, not blue-green, just different shades of olive. No one is passing off their OE mutts as Araucanas or Ameraucanas or even Quechuas. No one is going to buy a batch of Olive Eggs, hatch them, and then try to re-create pure Araucanas.

As they say in the movies "nothing to see here, move along...."
 
Last edited:
I'm checking in to this thread after numerous reports.

Kermit, I'm not sure you completely get the intent of this thread. Not everyone has such a lofty mission in life with their chickens--most want a color variety for their egg basket, not a lifelong avocation of saving nearly extinct species of birds. If that is your goal, then you do that, nothing wrong with it. It simply is not the intent of most of the BYC members here in this thread. Ideals are wonderful, but you cannot foist those on everyone else and become incensed when others don't jump on the bandwagon.

Naturally these are over-caffeinated opinions- please don't over react to them.

Perhaps you need to lower your caffeine intake a bit, eh?
wink.png
 
Quote:
? No idea where that's coming from. I've reiterated about ten times how much I value what you're attempting to do here.
The point I'm making has also been repeated several times. If you don't want to hear what I'm saying so be it. Hardly a troll. I'm done here.
 
Last edited:
Resolution's point is valid.

This "Olive Egger" phenomenon is going to contaminate a lot of prized stock in this country if we all do not proceed with the utmost caution. I'm pretty sure it's already happened to one fad breed and we will begin seeing the fallout soon.

Please don't misunderstand me, I'm all for your freedom to make pretty eggs. My chickens make pretty eggs as well, but they will not be confused with either of the parent stocks' breeds. If you put out into the world a bird that looks like an Araucana but is not, somewhere not far down the line, the progeny of that stock is going to seriously cause somebody some grief and agony. How about the person who has just lost his/her Araucana rooster and comes across one of your mixed-breed chickens that looks Araucana?

"Good deal on craigslist, honey! A true, tufted, rumpless Araucana rooster to replace ours!"

(six months later)

"OH NOES!!!! What is this???"
 
Quote:
Honestly, that would be their own fault for not researching that bird's bloodline. If you want a purebred Araucana, find a reputable breeder that keeps good records. That is how you preserve a rare breed, not by buying cheap look-a-likes from people who don't have any record of where their birds came from. Too easy.

I like green eggs and I think chickens should have tails. That is a personal preference and one I wouldn't expect to share with everyone on the board.
 
I think everyone is missing the point. Let me try and explain how I think this message of purity was supposed to come off. I have worked the fields of historical genetics, thus preservation for many years. Back many years ago there was a herd of horses on a Mt in Oklahoma. There was also a logging company that wanted that Mt and they couldn't have it with the horses there. So.. they infected the horses with EIA ( horsey AIDS) and expected them all to die. Thats not what happened. The herd of 80 Choctaw horses, the only ones left in the world were donated to the UV of OK and what happed next was amazing. The horses not only lived but created an anti body that now is a vaccine for AIDS.. only used in China at this time, but.. those 80 horses had something that no other horse had. We have lots of horses and lots of wonderful breeds, just like we have lots of chickens and lots of wonderful breeds. What we do know for a fact is that sometimes the old breeds, the ones that developed on thier own, have special things to offer human kind. Things that breeds developed later on don't have. So when we loose that one breed, we really loose. I was present at one such extinction back in the early 90s. Untill you witness the very last of something die, knowing you can never have it back, and no one younger then you are will ever see it again. You really can't say how you would feel. For me it was the most helpless feeling in the world and one that will stay with me forever. When you talk about having an old strain of anything that has been developed from natural selection and the numbers are few, I certainly support the preservation of that species before I support its being crossed. now.. The good Lord gave us choices here. There are males and there are females. When the males can be used in cross breeding and in preservation.. now thats wonderful. However its when the females are taken out of the preservation.. thats a shame.

Just my 2 cents worth.
 
Quote:
Really? So the breeder bears no responsibility in your opinion to ensure that his/her project stock does not contaminate the gene pool? It's all up to the buyer to make sure not to get hosed?
 
Alrighty, then.

Thank you, iajewel, for your take...it was written in a way that was not judgmental or nasty. I appreciate that, and because of your delivery, I will give much more thought to what you say. Nothing wrong with having an opinion, folks...it's all in the delivery.

This thread is, in essence, about mutts. If you don't like what we are chatting about, move on. If you wish to give your differing opinion, feel free to do so, but don't assume we'll change our minds. I, for one, have several purebred (Heritage) breeds, as well as my olive eggers - I love them all. I seriously don't see Araucanas or Ameraucanas going extinct by any means, and I don't believe there is a thing wrong with breeding mutts for a specific egg color. JMO.

Carry on!
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom