I totally get not selling or representing as RB birds that are not autosexable 100% at hatch. Where my confusion comes in is the "other" feather patterns we are seeing on RB that are autosexable. Do we call these "poorly marked" RB and work with them? I have only seen the lacing and pencilling and partridging in the hens and not the cock/erels (because of only one barring gene with females?). There are simply not enough "good" RB out there (type, color, or pattern) from what I can see.
I agree that selling culls for layers needs to be done carefully. I believe it is a mistake to give a "pedigree" on "mixed layers" no matter HOW BADLY the urban chickenkeeper wants you to. Some people have a real need to label everything. Their little mutt is a Chiweenie or a Schnoodle or whatever. They want to be able to say their hen is a Red Island Rhodebar or somesuch. It's ridiculous. As long as we say MIXED LAYER and adamantly refuse to use the word Rhodebar when referring to the mix it will help prevent that person in a year selling that hen as a Rhodebar, because that's all they can remember or all they want to remember when looking at pricing on craigslist. That being said, if only 1% or less of the people breeding do this, all is lost and I'm pretty sure that's the case.
I think the problem is (and will remain being) the all mighty dollar. You can get more money by calling them "rare" RB then you get by calling them backyard layers.
Penny