Things you wish you could say

[tripletfeb]

I don't see anything wrong

 

[tripletfeb]

I wish I could say that today was not the last day of Christmas break. And that it will be the end of May soon. I like my time off

 

[AntiqueB]

I wish I could say that today was not the last day of Christmas break. And that it will be the end of May soon. I like my time off

Wish I could say I felt like I had a break. I got the flu on the 26th, and really just feel better today.

 

[tripletfeb]

Wish I could say I felt like I had a break. I got the flu on the 26th, and really just feel better today.

Glad you feel better

 

[NatJ]

Nope, it is the palm being spread out.

There is AI used but it is the chicken added in the front.

It doesn't look that way to me, so I guess we'll have to agree to differ

 

[R2elk]

It doesn't look that way to me, so I guess we'll have to agree to differ

You can prove it to yourself by having a person sit on a bike with the hands in that position and take a photo from the same angle.

The pigtails flying are definitely AI as the bike is sitting still. Spokes in the wheels would be blurred if the wheels were turning.

 

[BigBlueHen53]

You can prove it to yourself by having a person sit on a bike with the hands in that position and take a photo from the same angle.

The pigtails flying are definitely AI as the bike is sitting still. Spokes in the wheels would be blurred if the wheels were turning.

I can see that being a bit expensive. A camera person on a moving transport following beside a girl on a bike just to get a realistic shot for a magazine cover. There may be other ways to do it, I suppose. Is this what AI is doing to us, making us hyper-cynical and nit-picky?

 

[R2elk]

I can see that being a bit expensive. A camera person on a moving transport following beside a girl on a bike just to get a realistic shot for a magazine cover. There may be other ways to do it, I suppose. Is this what AI is doing to us, making us hyper-cynical and nit-picky?

You can take the photo of a girl on a moving bike without being on a transport.

The bike in the image is not moving. It is stationary.

We used to call what was done to that image "photoshopped" and it happened a lot, long before they started AI images.

 

[NatJ]

You can prove it to yourself by having a person sit on a bike with the hands in that position and take a photo from the same angle.

I've squished my own hands in every possible way, and I can never get a bump that sticks out like the one that's just up from the end of the handlebar. The one with a red dot on it. Looks like an amputation or a nipple or something of the sort, to my eyes. There is just no way to get my own hands to make a point there, let alone a point that is red on the end.

The pigtails flying are definitely AI as the bike is sitting still. Spokes in the wheels would be blurred if the wheels were turning.

I spotted the flying pigtails vs. dangling skirt. I wasn't positive about the spokes in the wheels: a very fast exposure on slow-moving wheels might cause them to not look blurred, but in that case the dog should not be so very blurry. One way or another, the moving things vs. unmoving things are just mis-matched from how they should be.

 

[tripletfeb]

I wish I could say that AI does not make people question the simplest things. And therefore, it makes us less trusting of those things