I did my own research on the topic and I chose to vaccinate against Marek's and Coccidiosis, but nothing else. I chose this because most organic standards do allow for these two vaccinations, but no others. Also, I have read too many terrible things about Marek's and about the horrible death they die and about the lasting potential for its being contagious. And Coccidiosis comes from their poop and since they walk around in it, get it in their water and feed, etc (no matter how diligent we are about cleaning, this happens a bit), when they are very young, it can overwhelm their systems before their immunity kicks in... and since the vaccine is ok according to organic standards, I think it's OK to help them for those first two days.
I do agree that we should invade minimally and raising them organically is my number one priority, but keep in mind that the chicken is an animal that was created by humans and is no longer "native" to anywhere. They are originally from the jungles of Southeast Asia... so we do not keep them in their native environment, if you can even call it that. They are being exposed to unnatural conditions simply by being born a chicken and raised by humans in varying climates and locations. Just like it is not easy for chickens to scratch out a healthy existence on 100% free-range (no feed, no coop), it is also not natural for them to be born with an ability to survive the various biological threats in this man-made environment. If your chicken gets overloaded with worms, do you just let it suffer and die... or even let it be unhealthy and not lay well? The worms they get here in North America (or wherever you are located) are not the same worms (for the most part) that they would even get in their "native" Southeast Asia. They are exposed to soils, insects, and wild birds that they have not naturally evolved to live with. And, as far as nature's taking its course... we tossed that out the window long ago when we domesticated and bred these fowl for our own purposes... creating fantastical new traits that never existed in nature.
So, I believe that it is our duty as humans to fulfill our side of the bargain - we took them from the wild, bred them according to our whims and needs... to get the best meat, eggs, feathers, etc... and in turn, they have become unable to survive on their own. Thus, we must take care of them in this man-made setting. We must give them the tools they need to have the best chance of survival. Now, this doesn't mean everyone should go out and coddle every little sickly, weakling, inbred runt... or pump their birds full of chemicals and antibiotics. No, minimal chemical and physical interference is still ideal in my mind as it translates to less-contaminated birds, environments, and people. But to make a case for "letting nature take its course" when it comes to chickens in a general sense, I think that's pretty silly. This is just my own opinion.
In my own mind, the ideal situation is to use the most helpful and least potentially dangerous vaccines and medicines only when reasonable and necessary - the problem today is that chickens (especially industrially-farmed chickens) are doused with every anti-biotic and vaccine the farmers can get their hands on, in an effort to maximize profit and minimize disease without any real thought or consideration for the situation in mind. Just like you shouldn't go to a doctor who prescribes you antibiotics every time you get a cold (antibiotics only treat bacterial infections and do nothing for a cold or flu and only increase your own resistance to the effectiveness of antibiotics in the future), you also shouldn't vaccinate your birds against every possible thing and give them medications and anitbiotics as preventatives "just in case." I think more thought should be put into it than that, and take a minimal approach.
These are just my own thoughts. Thanks for listening.
I do agree that we should invade minimally and raising them organically is my number one priority, but keep in mind that the chicken is an animal that was created by humans and is no longer "native" to anywhere. They are originally from the jungles of Southeast Asia... so we do not keep them in their native environment, if you can even call it that. They are being exposed to unnatural conditions simply by being born a chicken and raised by humans in varying climates and locations. Just like it is not easy for chickens to scratch out a healthy existence on 100% free-range (no feed, no coop), it is also not natural for them to be born with an ability to survive the various biological threats in this man-made environment. If your chicken gets overloaded with worms, do you just let it suffer and die... or even let it be unhealthy and not lay well? The worms they get here in North America (or wherever you are located) are not the same worms (for the most part) that they would even get in their "native" Southeast Asia. They are exposed to soils, insects, and wild birds that they have not naturally evolved to live with. And, as far as nature's taking its course... we tossed that out the window long ago when we domesticated and bred these fowl for our own purposes... creating fantastical new traits that never existed in nature.
So, I believe that it is our duty as humans to fulfill our side of the bargain - we took them from the wild, bred them according to our whims and needs... to get the best meat, eggs, feathers, etc... and in turn, they have become unable to survive on their own. Thus, we must take care of them in this man-made setting. We must give them the tools they need to have the best chance of survival. Now, this doesn't mean everyone should go out and coddle every little sickly, weakling, inbred runt... or pump their birds full of chemicals and antibiotics. No, minimal chemical and physical interference is still ideal in my mind as it translates to less-contaminated birds, environments, and people. But to make a case for "letting nature take its course" when it comes to chickens in a general sense, I think that's pretty silly. This is just my own opinion.
In my own mind, the ideal situation is to use the most helpful and least potentially dangerous vaccines and medicines only when reasonable and necessary - the problem today is that chickens (especially industrially-farmed chickens) are doused with every anti-biotic and vaccine the farmers can get their hands on, in an effort to maximize profit and minimize disease without any real thought or consideration for the situation in mind. Just like you shouldn't go to a doctor who prescribes you antibiotics every time you get a cold (antibiotics only treat bacterial infections and do nothing for a cold or flu and only increase your own resistance to the effectiveness of antibiotics in the future), you also shouldn't vaccinate your birds against every possible thing and give them medications and anitbiotics as preventatives "just in case." I think more thought should be put into it than that, and take a minimal approach.
These are just my own thoughts. Thanks for listening.