One of my biggest gripes/questions about these things is that they rarely give "relative impact" studies.
For example, I know it's "bad" to be exposed to x-rays, but what's the level of exposure during a Dr. visit vs. a transatlantic flight?
I know being in the same room as a 3D printer might be bad, but how's that compare to being in the same room as someone smoking?
I know microplastics in water-bottles is "bad", but how's that compare to the particulate matter of material coming off tires on the cars in front of me on the highway... and how's that compare to the carcinogens in my yummy burnt BBQ mean and fried foods?
Are we talking 1-to-1 danger/risk, or 1-to-1,000,000?
As I do risk-management and make decisions, I'd like to have as much data as possible so I'm applying my worry and effort accordingly.
For example, I know it's "bad" to be exposed to x-rays, but what's the level of exposure during a Dr. visit vs. a transatlantic flight?
I know being in the same room as a 3D printer might be bad, but how's that compare to being in the same room as someone smoking?
I know microplastics in water-bottles is "bad", but how's that compare to the particulate matter of material coming off tires on the cars in front of me on the highway... and how's that compare to the carcinogens in my yummy burnt BBQ mean and fried foods?
Are we talking 1-to-1 danger/risk, or 1-to-1,000,000?
As I do risk-management and make decisions, I'd like to have as much data as possible so I'm applying my worry and effort accordingly.