Join the frustration club
Differences in language are reasonable: red, rojo, rouge, etc. Differences in terminology that are not based upon different language are frustrating, but it isn't limited to chicken colours. Try telling an Englishman to mow his yard and he'll think you're crazy; tell an American to mow his garden and he'll think the same.
Basic genetic lesson:
Chicken plumage is determined by only two pigments: eumelanin and pheomelanin, black & red. There are a number of genes that dilute (and others that intensify) the pigment present in a bird. Some affect only, or mostly one, of the pigments; others affect both equally.
Blue (Bl) has very little affect on red pigment, but can have significant affect on black pigment. Lavender (lav) affects both pigments equally.
Dilute (Di), champagne blonde (Cb) and inhibitor of gold, aka cream, (ig) are three separate genes that affect primarily red pigment. Di also affects dermal pigment; ig does not; not sure about Cb. Di is incompletely dominant; Cb is dominant and ig is recessive. I
think the appearance is difference depending on which of these dilution genes are present--singly or in combination. Perhaps Henk can clarify this.