Good, because the information on this site says 95F for the first week, and the air temp in the room is just under 90F but they've got the IR lamp to bask under like the slightly more advanced lizards they are
There's a lot of misinformation out there. The bird's behavior is the best indicator. I have always used 75W bulbs in brooder (still the reflector usually or a very low socket) rather than heat lamps. My latest batch is trying out the Ecoglow from
Brinsea as it is getting hard to find incandescent bulbs with the tree huggers wanting us all to switch to LED and fluorescent (which i love and use in house for savings, but no heat), it doesn't get hot (warm to the touch) and haven't taken a temp under it but they are thriving. It will pay for itself shortly from energy savings I'm sure too. I like that it lets you control the photoperiod for the chicks too. I have found the chicks grow better if they aren't exposed to light 24/7 asap in the past (One reason I suspect winter hatched chicks never grew as large as spring and summer hatches, so these newer type brooders will be good for that too. What shocked me was, that since it's directed heat, how much time OUTSIDE of it's influence the babies have been spending. I mean yes they are in house which is around 65* F but they will stay out from under the heat running and scratching for an hour or so then tuck themselves under heat source for a bit, it's really pretty amazing. Definitely reenforces that behavior of the birds is the best way to go...if you think about it, when a hen hatches chicks they don't spend ALL DAY snuggled up in the heat under her either,and many many old timers will tell you chicks raised by a broody are the healthiest.
Anyway, I've babbled enough on that but it's fascinating to me. I think the closer we can emulate the natural ways the better (it's the idea behind "dry" incubating too)