Yer smart--thank you!"Does anyone know how much electricity we use to substitute?"
Oooh! I can actually give you an answer to this. :O I've done a lot of sustainability comparisons because a lot of folks who chat with me about it are like "Man! Modern tech draws sooooo much power!" etc.etc. But the reality is the actual power draw is VERY small.
So some facts I can pull real quick;
Production of 20 sheets of printing worthy paper uses about 1.4 KWH. So your average 20 page catalog (once you factor in the printing/binding) probably uses about 2KWH just to make, not to ship, not including manufacturing errors post paper production.
Using a laptop computer for 8 hours uses about .6 KWH and puts about .4lbs of CO2 in the air. A desktop would be about double that.
The CO2 balance of paper is trickier because it puts about .5lbs of CO2 into the air (minimally more than 8hrs computer usage) BEFORE printing and shipping (so the actual number is probably a bit higher) for 20 pages. But the older a tree is, the more CO2 it captures to build it's own bulk, sequestering it and it's exponential. So a 50 centimeter wide tree captures a third the carbon of a 100 cm wide tree. So the longer trees are allowed to grow, the better they work as carbon sinks. The average tree absorbs 48lbs of CO2 a year, but older trees may absorb many times more that. So the less area we are regularly harvesting, the more carbon sinks into trees. Trees also contribute to climate in other ways, such as weather patterns. Having forests literally creates rain, stores water in the air and soil around the tree, provides wildlife homes, etc. In places that have been heavily logged, like Haiti, they have really severe drought because they literally have no trees left.
I know around here (Ohio) a lot of our wood and pulp comes from people purchasing an old, cheap deer-hunting type property and having it timbered, sell the trees off, and then offload the cleared land to some farmer who has less work to turn it into a field now or to a deer hunter who will just plant a forage plot.
Also, over their lifetime, solar panels produce 1/3rd the emissions of current average CO2/per KWH from electricity production now. So as we move into renewable electric sources it will become wildly impractical for people to print paper catalogs every year.
TL;DR
Computers are better.
Computers release a slightly smaller amount of CO2 and uses half the electricity of a 20-page paper catalog. Each tree NOT cut this way also sequesters an additional 48+lbs of CO2 each year on average.
When you start crunching that across hundreds/thousands of people, it adds up a lot. The math gets even more dramatic if electricity is produced from renewable sources.
And that doesn't take into account water usage and other effects.
SOURCES! :O
https://www.energuide.be/en/questio...-use-and-how-much-co2-does-that-represent/54/
http://cua6.urban.csuohio.edu/~sanda/syl/envpol/materials/GREEN FACTS.pdf
https://environment-review.yale.edu/carbon-capture-tree-size-matters-0
https://cwsglobal.org/drought-and-climate-change-in-haiti/
https://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research-innovations/blogs/how-much-co2-does-one-solar-panel-create
https://www.epa.gov/energy/greenhouse-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references