I don't mean this statement to be case explicit, but as a general observation: Trapping problem animals and relocating them to a different area is compatible, and based on the same mentality, as "dumping" unwanted puppies, dogs, kittens, and cats away from home for someone else to deal with rather than face the responsibility of handling the matter oneself in an intelligent, and dutiful, way. The thinking many times is that to take pets to a pound just means they will be put to death, but if they are turned loose somebody will take them in. It doesn't happen that way. I have seen too many sad looking, frightened dogs and cats roaming down a highway wondering why they weren't wanted - and to be run over by automobiles; or cats and dogs that starved to death because everytime they wandered into some yard they were run off, or even killed by owner's dogs. The responsible thing to do with unwanted pets is to give them away, if possible, taken to the pound, or put down by the owner in a humane way. The same responsibility applies to trapped predators. Predators are territorial: coyotes, fox, mountain lions, wolves, bobcats, skunks, etc., mark their territories and patrol their boundaries. Intruders are either driven out or killed. Yes, on occasion, one is accepted just as sometimes a stray dog or cat is taken in. But that's the exception, not the rule. And, granted, a wild animal relocated has a better chance for survival than a dumped pet, but it still becomes a burden on the environment it is relocated to. If you have unwanted pets, despose of them humanely; if you trap predators, dispose of them in a humane way. In neither case is the humane way to dump them on somebody, or something, else to take care of.
