While I don't have all day to refute the GLORY of GM crops, in terms of how they help Africa, you may want to read this article ("GM Crops Irrelevant for Africa") about how they are ineffectual at solving the hunger issue. (Excerpts follow). There are plenty of native populations that subsist on eating just ANIMALS and ANIMAL PRODUCTS, especially in drought-plauged regions -- this has been a survival technique to such peoples, because they can glean better nutrition in arid regions from animals that feed off of just grass. Crops aren't always the answer to hunger, and GM crops aren't necessarily what they are talked up to be.
An Associated Press article in June profiling Robb Fraley, Monsanto's chief technology officer and Robert Horsch, its vice president of product and technology cooperation, notes that Horsch manages a Monsanto program designed to help farmers in developing nations improve their farming methods. Horsch is reported to have said his mission is twofold: "create goodwill and help open future markets." . . .
Meanwhile, conventional crop breeding methods, which cost much less and produce better results, have failed to attract attention from both African governments and biotech companies.
More alarming is the amount of money earmarked for these crop innovations, when cotton and sweet potato are not even major crops in Africa and thus will not in any way solve Africa's poverty/hunger problems.
[emphasis added]
Meanwhile, conventional crop breeding methods, which cost much less and produce better results, have failed to attract attention from both African governments and biotech companies.
More alarming is the amount of money earmarked for these crop innovations, when cotton and sweet potato are not even major crops in Africa and thus will not in any way solve Africa's poverty/hunger problems.
[emphasis added]