I'm no vet, but wanted to raise a caution about presuming recovered birds are no longer infectious. When my flock had apparent IB (suspected to have come by a bought-in carrier) it was quite an acute disease with very obvious symptoms of rattles, rales, mucus and general unwellness (the quickness of disease spread, low mortality, severity of symptoms and ensuing permanent wrinkly eggs and runny albumen were also fairly indicative). I isolated that flock and when they were all apparently well again (after several weeks of seeing no respiratory signs, though of course the egg shell issues seemed permanent) I brought in some new layers. These new birds all caught the disease and went on to have eggshell and other problems. I tried 3 times to raise chicks to laying age only to have them catch IB on the way and not be able to lay properly when the time came.
Finally, reluctantly, I culled and cleaned the pens. After about two weeks I bought replacements. They never ever caught or showed symptoms of IB (over about 5 years). I feel it's impossible to know where the original disease came from, but I do suspect it was brought in by a carrier-chicken and not by wild , or I feel I would have seen the disease again.
This is from the Merck Veterinary Manual (
http://www.merckvetmanual.com/mvm/index.jsp?cfile=htm/bc/206500.htm):
'Naturally infected chickens and those vaccinated with live IBV may intermittently shed virus for many weeks or even months. Virus infection in layers and breeders occurs cyclically as immunity declines or on exposure to different serotypes.'
I don't mean to contradict expert veterinary advice, but I do feel there's good reason to be cautious about seemingly-recovered birds.
Best wishes,
Erica (who no longer gets wrinkly eggs)