Here are the results!
View attachment 1654921
Although Chow Chow was really surprising and I am not sure I believe it. Also a huge portion unidentifiable. But their sample also wasn’t the best, like not for the full time frame, cause he wouldn’t let her do it/hated it, but I guess they found something. But I also find it a little suspicious it’s the same exact percentages as Libby for parts. They are different dogs. You would think the percentages would vary a little bit. Like they are both supposedly 37.5% Great Pyrenees and 12.5% something else (for Libby it’s Boxer, for Franklin it’s Chow Chow), and then Libby is 25% Lab and 25% unknown, so the Lab and Unknown bit is slightly different but I find it odd the main breeds are exact same, like exactly 37.5% and exactly 12.5% but idk. Wisdom is supposed to be one of the most accurate ones though, there are some that are not very accurate at all. The next most accurate is Embark which also tests for like 200 genetic diseases, which would be nice to know but not really necessary, and supposedly uses a lot more genetic markers (so more accurate), and it is a university that does it, but that one is like $200 so I don’t think they’ll do that one. But it would be nice to see if they both say the same thing and find out the unknown bit. Anyway, supposedly the test only goes to great great grandparents so the unknown is great great great grandparents. We thought for sure he would be like Aussie, Collie, or setter or Golden or something. But maybe that is what the unknown is. A little disappointing there is so much unknown on his.