- Apr 15, 2011
- 2,957
- 179
- 261
So they would just rather put them to sleep than take a chance on someone that comes with good recommendations
If you dig around into the financial books of some popular animal rights groups, you actually see that sort of logic. "An animal is better off dead than going out to another home where it can be abused again or 'enslaved'", is the sort of thinking that the numbers seem to show. How much of that is actually driven by wanting to use the majority of funds to push agendas? I couldn't say. But, it is somewhat familiar to how animal hoarders usually start off. They often believe that they are the only ones who can save all the little animals, which drives the delusion that they are helping even as swarms of unfed, dead, and dying animals surround them. With shelters/rescues, sometimes that does happen, and they eventually get shut down for neglect. Sometimes incompetence and poor management are the root of the issue, and a simple overhaul of upper-staff fixes the major problems. Sometimes people who have power-driven personality disorders do strive to gain these sorts of jobs (ANY position seen as capable of holding sway over others. Some may laugh at, say, a management position at a fast food joint, but some take that illusion of power very, very seriously), and the results aren't pleasant, especially if they also are actively seeking profit for themselves. And, some just seek profit, through abusing their position to dishonestly collect money (With shelters with this issue, it often is seen as tickets for ridiculous situations, such as handing someone with a young puppy in their lap on their home porch a ticket for breaking a leash law. Some places, especially rural, take it further with confiscating animals wrongfully and charging owners in a sort of blackmail situation. I've seen vets do it too. For example, by charging way, way more than they stated, and 'holding' the animal until the owner pays...it's gross. Heck, I've seen hospitals do it too. My husband's father was charged $70 because they put socks on his feet during his stay for surgery. Not even kidding. Socks.). Adoption agencies have the ability to do wonderful work and improve the lives of many. But, it doesn't mean that any group claiming to be a "rescue" or offer "shelter" should never be questioned or examined, or given a free pass because we assume they "do good work". Better regulation of some groups would help, and so does personally carefully researching and examining chosen shelters before donating, and not supporting groups that are not fair or well managed. Putting public pressure on shelters can also help. Our local shelter opened some cats and dogs to go to certain outside homes, where as they would not before.
If you dig around into the financial books of some popular animal rights groups, you actually see that sort of logic. "An animal is better off dead than going out to another home where it can be abused again or 'enslaved'", is the sort of thinking that the numbers seem to show. How much of that is actually driven by wanting to use the majority of funds to push agendas? I couldn't say. But, it is somewhat familiar to how animal hoarders usually start off. They often believe that they are the only ones who can save all the little animals, which drives the delusion that they are helping even as swarms of unfed, dead, and dying animals surround them. With shelters/rescues, sometimes that does happen, and they eventually get shut down for neglect. Sometimes incompetence and poor management are the root of the issue, and a simple overhaul of upper-staff fixes the major problems. Sometimes people who have power-driven personality disorders do strive to gain these sorts of jobs (ANY position seen as capable of holding sway over others. Some may laugh at, say, a management position at a fast food joint, but some take that illusion of power very, very seriously), and the results aren't pleasant, especially if they also are actively seeking profit for themselves. And, some just seek profit, through abusing their position to dishonestly collect money (With shelters with this issue, it often is seen as tickets for ridiculous situations, such as handing someone with a young puppy in their lap on their home porch a ticket for breaking a leash law. Some places, especially rural, take it further with confiscating animals wrongfully and charging owners in a sort of blackmail situation. I've seen vets do it too. For example, by charging way, way more than they stated, and 'holding' the animal until the owner pays...it's gross. Heck, I've seen hospitals do it too. My husband's father was charged $70 because they put socks on his feet during his stay for surgery. Not even kidding. Socks.). Adoption agencies have the ability to do wonderful work and improve the lives of many. But, it doesn't mean that any group claiming to be a "rescue" or offer "shelter" should never be questioned or examined, or given a free pass because we assume they "do good work". Better regulation of some groups would help, and so does personally carefully researching and examining chosen shelters before donating, and not supporting groups that are not fair or well managed. Putting public pressure on shelters can also help. Our local shelter opened some cats and dogs to go to certain outside homes, where as they would not before.