Quote:
If the judges are judging to what the APA standard says then we should be able to know whether ours measure up or not whether we can attend shows or not. I realize that what the standard says is open to each individual judges perception, but when it gets down to it if they're judging by the standard it shouldn't differ very much.
A couple of points, at least as far as dogs go, and I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it applies to chickens. When you exhibit to an experienced judge of your breed, you are paying for an objective, very experienced individual to place your exhibits with regard to the standard and to the quality of the other animals in the class.
You mention that if judges judge to the given standard, then owners can also know if their animals measure up to that standard. Most people are not born with the "eye" to judge animals. Rarely, you find a person with a natural eye, usually an artistic person. It takes much study and it takes seeing numbers of the breed. It also takes seeing a given number of superior animals in the flesh, so the judge gets that breed's type cemented in his or her mind. I've had more than a couple of proud dog owners show me their beloved pet and announce "he's just like the dog that won Westminster". Needless to say, every pet owner who has made that comment to me has had beautiful, pet quality animals. Loving, smart, yes. BIS at Westminster? Not on this planet.
This is not to say a lay person cannot have better than average birds. People who study and who seek out good breeders from which to buy will have birds that make others stop in their tracks. However, to get the absolute, top of the breed, it takes exhibiting the best animals to experienced, top drawer judges.
Well since I'm a very artistic person maybe I'm one of those rare people with a natural eye for it.
If the judges are judging to what the APA standard says then we should be able to know whether ours measure up or not whether we can attend shows or not. I realize that what the standard says is open to each individual judges perception, but when it gets down to it if they're judging by the standard it shouldn't differ very much.
A couple of points, at least as far as dogs go, and I'll bet dollars to doughnuts it applies to chickens. When you exhibit to an experienced judge of your breed, you are paying for an objective, very experienced individual to place your exhibits with regard to the standard and to the quality of the other animals in the class.
You mention that if judges judge to the given standard, then owners can also know if their animals measure up to that standard. Most people are not born with the "eye" to judge animals. Rarely, you find a person with a natural eye, usually an artistic person. It takes much study and it takes seeing numbers of the breed. It also takes seeing a given number of superior animals in the flesh, so the judge gets that breed's type cemented in his or her mind. I've had more than a couple of proud dog owners show me their beloved pet and announce "he's just like the dog that won Westminster". Needless to say, every pet owner who has made that comment to me has had beautiful, pet quality animals. Loving, smart, yes. BIS at Westminster? Not on this planet.
This is not to say a lay person cannot have better than average birds. People who study and who seek out good breeders from which to buy will have birds that make others stop in their tracks. However, to get the absolute, top of the breed, it takes exhibiting the best animals to experienced, top drawer judges.
Well since I'm a very artistic person maybe I'm one of those rare people with a natural eye for it.
