LOL!

The bird's already flown the coop on that one by a couple centuries. I'm imagining a whole bunch of grammar police getting in those poor puritan's faces, screaming "It's a COCK! use the proper term! Telling people to call them roosters is BAD ADVICE!" Not only that, I recently posted a video on here in which it was explained that guineas were originally referred to as "turkey cocks" in the English language. So really, we're all mistaken when we refer to guineas as, well, guineas!
You're clearly a prescriptivist rather than a descriptivist. I totally get that; I get all curmudgeonly feeling sometimes when I hear some people speaking. One of the worst for me is "salty." Growing up, for me that meant tough and grizzled, like a seasoned sailor. Today it means upset, pouty, that sort of thing - a complete flip, and it rubs me the wrong way. It's not just the younger generation that gets to me, either. My grandmother and her peers always call flip flops "thongs." Gah! I can still picture the embarrassment I felt before I realized they were talking to me about footwear rather than underwear.
If I could travel into the future, I'd skip ahead every 50 years just to see how much language has changed. Imagine the Puritanism bug coming back into vogue, and "cock" being completely relegated to use as an expletive. Instead we'd have woodrooster, pearooster, etc. That might take awhile, though, considering it took "cock" about eight centuries before people started using it to refer to male anatomy as well as male birds. Or maybe "rooster" will one day be joining "cock" as a questionable and not-so-polite word one day? It's almost a shame I'll be missing it.
Oh, and here's a couple more pictures of my turkey cocks!
View attachment 3641446