Gosh, you'd think these APA guys would be happy to be able to spread their brand of wisdom, that they'd be glad so many are interested in the issues with this breed. They aren't willing to help other than say "Join the APA!", seems to me. Do they have a secret handshake we have to learn before we get some real "in the trenches" help? I do not join clubs. I do not show. I do not want to do either, but if I was still breeding Delawares, I'd want to work toward what they should be. That is part of preserving a breed.
No one here ever said they had show quality Delawares. We are all working toward the goal of meeting the standard and most of us won't show due to the disease risk. I do not want a drawing- I want a photograph of a Delaware rooster these judges feel actually meets the Standard. I'm betting they have never seen one live and in the flesh. Till then, we are all interpreting someone else's interpretation of the standard drawn in pen and ink. To criticize and snub and nothing else doesn't help any one breed better Delawares. I'd like to see some logic and common sense injected into the sheen issue, among others. To say the bantam has sheen and the LF doesn't is completely illogical.
I may not understand completely the purpose of the APA, but teaching is part of it, no? I prefer the method where you tell someone what they are doing right, not just what they are doing wrong, and giving examples of what the goal is. The pencil drawing and the cartoonish painting in the SOP just aren't as useful as they should be. If the Delawares from well known breeders are so awful, then when you do see one in a show, why should it get a blue ribbon? Just because it's the best of the ones who were entered? What if it's not good according to the SOP, barring actual disqualifiersl, but the best of that batch at the show? Can they refuse to hand out a blue ribbon? If not, then the winner can say his bird won at an APA-sanctioned show and is show quality and charge major bucks for chicks and eggs. And how much is politics, as it is in dog shows and horse shows? Does a certain breeder's name just carry weight, even if his stock is really not up to snuff?
To quote the great Forrest Gump, "That's all I have to say 'bout that". Best of luck trying to find the information and clarification you need, folks.
No one here ever said they had show quality Delawares. We are all working toward the goal of meeting the standard and most of us won't show due to the disease risk. I do not want a drawing- I want a photograph of a Delaware rooster these judges feel actually meets the Standard. I'm betting they have never seen one live and in the flesh. Till then, we are all interpreting someone else's interpretation of the standard drawn in pen and ink. To criticize and snub and nothing else doesn't help any one breed better Delawares. I'd like to see some logic and common sense injected into the sheen issue, among others. To say the bantam has sheen and the LF doesn't is completely illogical.
I may not understand completely the purpose of the APA, but teaching is part of it, no? I prefer the method where you tell someone what they are doing right, not just what they are doing wrong, and giving examples of what the goal is. The pencil drawing and the cartoonish painting in the SOP just aren't as useful as they should be. If the Delawares from well known breeders are so awful, then when you do see one in a show, why should it get a blue ribbon? Just because it's the best of the ones who were entered? What if it's not good according to the SOP, barring actual disqualifiersl, but the best of that batch at the show? Can they refuse to hand out a blue ribbon? If not, then the winner can say his bird won at an APA-sanctioned show and is show quality and charge major bucks for chicks and eggs. And how much is politics, as it is in dog shows and horse shows? Does a certain breeder's name just carry weight, even if his stock is really not up to snuff?
To quote the great Forrest Gump, "That's all I have to say 'bout that". Best of luck trying to find the information and clarification you need, folks.