Backyard Brahmas!!

Seeing how I was the cause of the recent unpleasantness and guessing that A1mom might not read this thread again anytime soon I PM'ed her, and explained the rational behind my position on the subject. With the education of other new comers I thought I'd go ahead and post parts of that message here as well.


[ I have been on a crusade as it were, to educate people on proper color and pattern names, mostly as a result of some folks crossing up breeds and then trying to hang a fanciful name on them to promate sales of their new "creation".

The use of red and lemon pyle names is commonly misused in Europe, and they use the name on a couple different patterns. A true pyle colored bird contains dominant white, which in effect turns all parts of the feather that would normally be black to white. Being a dominant trait, it only takes one copy of the gene to show itself in a bird. Recessive white on the other hand requires two copies to show, and turns the entire bird white.

What in fact the so called pyles in the Brahma breed, or so far as I know, are actually splash phase blue birds of either partridge(penciled), or columbian, patterns. You see blue is a diluter of black, A single copy of blue dilutes the black parts of a feather to a bluish grey color, If a bird receives two copies of blue those same parts are a washed out white, with possible specs of blue.

While pyle and splash may look similar at first glance, the are two very different colors.

One way to test which you have is breed it to a black patterned bird. If the resulting chicks are white trimmed,(if the pyle parent carries two copies of dominant white), or half white, and half black trimmed,(if pyle parent carries only one copy of dominant white), then you in fact have a pyle. But if breeding your pyle to a black gets you blue chicks then it is a splash, and should be called such.]
 
Hatched 3 darks Saturday and Sunday. I'm having the toughest time hatching out darks, but at least this time I was a little more successful.

The one that hatched yesterday had to be helped out of the shell. It pipped on Saturday, zipped overnight Saturday night and then was stuck in the bottom half of the shell. I usually don't help with hatching, figuring that if they can't make it out then they are too weak to live. After watching it struggle for about 12 hours, I finally decided to give it a hand. Seems that the shell was stuck with this goopy, half dried, glue like substance to the chick's back (the ambi cord was already drying and shriveling). So, put 100 degree water in a bowl, dunked the chick and egg shell in to the neck (not the head!) and slowly removed the shell over a few hours. After I removed the shell, the chick still couldn't open its eyes and its wings were stuck to its sides and one leg was stuck to the bottom of the chick So, more cleaning up just to remove the "glue" and then put him/her in the brooder without much hope that it would survive the night.

This morning, it is chirping, moving and seems healthy and happy. Don't know if I did the right thing, but I thought I'd share for anyone else that has a problem like this.

BTW, I've NEVER had anything like this happen at hatching before. I raised the humidity about 10% higher than normal to see if it would make a difference because I am at altitude and have had so many problems. One other thing that might have contributed to this was that my auto turner was turned off sometime during the incubation period. I don't know who or when, so perhaps this was part of the problem as well. Anyway, live and learn!

It would be interesting to keep a very detailed record of conditions during incubation, and hatch specifically. Outside air temp., if you were running air conditioning (if incubating in the house), probably most importantly humidity/dew point, to see if any pattern shows with hatching results.
 
Seeing how I was the cause of the recent unpleasantness and guessing that A1mom might not read this thread again anytime soon I PM'ed her, and explained the rational behind my position on the subject. With the education of other new comers I thought I'd go ahead and post parts of that message here as well.


[ I have been on a crusade as it were, to educate people on proper color and pattern names, mostly as a result of some folks crossing up breeds and then trying to hang a fanciful name on them to promate sales of their new "creation".

The use of red and lemon pyle names is commonly misused in Europe, and they use the name on a couple different patterns. A true pyle colored bird contains dominant white, which in effect turns all parts of the feather that would normally be black to white. Being a dominant trait, it only takes one copy of the gene to show itself in a bird. Recessive white on the other hand requires two copies to show, and turns the entire bird white.

What in fact the so called pyles in the Brahma breed, or so far as I know, are actually splash phase blue birds of either partridge(penciled), or columbian, patterns. You see blue is a diluter of black, A single copy of blue dilutes the black parts of a feather to a bluish grey color, If a bird receives two copies of blue those same parts are a washed out white, with possible specs of blue.

While pyle and splash may look similar at first glance, the are two very different colors.

One way to test which you have is breed it to a black patterned bird. If the resulting chicks are white trimmed,(if the pyle parent carries two copies of dominant white), or half white, and half black trimmed,(if pyle parent carries only one copy of dominant white), then you in fact have a pyle. But if breeding your pyle to a black gets you blue chicks then it is a splash, and should be called such.]

I just did an image search for 'pyle Brahma'. Very confusing. BigMedicine, do you have a picture of a true pyle?
 
I just did an image search for 'pyle Brahma'. Very confusing. BigMedicine, do you have a picture of a true pyle?

Your telling me. This is why I would like to keep this nonsense from taking root over here. If the Brit's want to misuse the term, I guess that's there business, same for accepting vulture hocks in their standard, I guess.

But this is an American breed, developed here. and feel we set the standard for what a real Brahma should look like, and be described. (Anybody else hearing Otter's speech when the Delta's were in front of the review board in Animal House in their head here too ?)

The most common true red pyle that comes to mind is found in Old English Games, ( I wonder if we bastardized their standard in our version ?)
 
Last edited:
Seeing how I was the cause of the recent unpleasantness and guessing that A1mom might not read this thread again anytime soon I PM'ed her, and explained the rational behind my position on the subject. With the education of other new comers I thought I'd go ahead and post parts of that message here as well.

  
[ I have been on a crusade as it were, to educate people on proper color and pattern names, mostly as a result of some folks crossing up breeds and then trying to hang a fanciful name on them to promate sales of their new "creation". 

The use of red and lemon pyle names is commonly misused in Europe, and they use the name on a couple different patterns.  A true pyle colored bird contains dominant white, which in effect turns all parts of the feather that would normally be black to white. Being a dominant trait, it only takes one copy of the gene to show itself in a bird. Recessive white on the other hand requires two copies to show, and turns the entire bird white.

What in fact the so called pyles in the Brahma breed, or so far as I know, are actually splash phase blue birds of either partridge(penciled), or columbian, patterns. You see blue is a diluter of black, A single copy of blue dilutes the black parts of a feather to a bluish grey color, If a bird receives two copies of blue those same parts are a washed out white, with possible specs of blue. 

While pyle and splash may look similar at first glance, the are two very different colors.

One way to test which you have is breed it to a black patterned bird.  If the resulting chicks are white trimmed,(if the pyle parent carries two copies of dominant white), or half white, and half black trimmed,(if pyle parent carries only one copy of dominant white), then you in fact have a pyle. But if breeding your pyle to a black gets you blue chicks then it is a splash, and should be called such.]

I can sympathize with your frustration here. My own personal pet peeve is stores and hatcheries labeling Easter Eggers as Ameraucanas or worse Araucanas just for the sake of saleability. Makes me want to scream when others who are in a position to do so intentionally mislead customers for their own profit. I am all for labeling things what they ARE not what will make a quick buck and spread and breed ignorance.
 
I can sympathize with your frustration here. My own personal pet peeve is stores and hatcheries labeling Easter Eggers as Ameraucanas or worse Araucanas just for the sake of saleability. Makes me want to scream when others who are in a position to do so intentionally mislead customers for their own profit. I am all for labeling things what they ARE not what will make a quick buck and spread and breed ignorance.


Exactly, I think too often some folks get snookered by some someone selling some birds/eggs with a flashy name. But as you say, in my mind, that does not justify trying to recoup their investment by continuing the charade.
 
Last edited:
Animal House...love that movie!

Thanks for the picture. Now when I reread what you wrote it makes more sense.
So knowing that the European 'lemon pyle' is pretty popular (I've seen lots of pics of them lately), what would be the proper label for that color? Lemon or red splash??
 
It would be interesting to keep a very detailed record of conditions during incubation, and hatch specifically. Outside air temp., if you were running air conditioning (if incubating in the house), probably most importantly humidity/dew point, to see if any pattern shows with hatching results.
You are absolutely right, keeping good records is a must. There is actually a group of us that have a thread and are working on some experimentation with high altitude hatching. I think I'm at the lowest altitude of 4500 ft, but there are some that are all of the way up to 8000 ft +. Here are some articles if anyone is interested, as well as a link to the high altitude hatching thread. I really think what got me this time was the turner getting unplugged mysteriously, but it also might have been the humidity being so high. We'll see what happens when I start up again.

I keep my incubator in what my husband calls the "chicken room". Temperature is a constant 80 degrees, humidity is variable depending on the weather but is generally between 12-25% (ambient). My first 4 hatches this year, the ambient humidity was between 10-15%. I kept the incubator at a constant 50-55% for the first 18 days, then upped it to between 65-70%. My hatch rate was 4/84 eggs (just the shipped eggs) which is abysmal, only 8 made it to lockdown as goers, I kept a few more maybes in lockdown but never really expected anything out of them. All of these eggs came from close to sea level. This hatch (eggs came from 3700 ft), I kept the bator between 55-60% for the first 18 days, then increased it to 72% for the last three days. I also used soda lime after day 12 to remove the CO2 from the incubator and increase oxygen availability. That resulted in 6/16 viable for lockdown, 3 hatched and the 4th probably would have if not for the goop problem which killed the chick after it had zipped.

TMI, I know, but maybe all of this will help someone else. I look forward to trying again in the fall....I learned a lot I think from this hatch about having shipped eggs from lower elevations to hatch and am excited to try again with hopefully better results. I just keep studying, keeping a journal and trying! BTW, there is no problem that I can see with hatching eggs from my own flock, only shipped eggs from lower elevations.

https://www.backyardchickens.com/t/194395/hatching-at-high-altitude
http://www.hatchtech.nl/aboutus/articles/High Altitude Incubation.pdf
http://ps.oxfordjournals.org/content/87/10/2112.full
http://www.pasreform.com/academy/fr...cubation/25-incubation-at-high-altitudes.html
https://www.backyardchickens.com/t/303882/carbon-dioxide-causes-the-pip-with-muscle-spasms
https://www.backyardchickens.com/t/...d-oxygen-levels-in-the-incubator#post_5465503
https://www.backyardchickens.com/t/805213/co2-in-incubating
https://www.backyardchickens.com/t/843903/has-anybody-used-a-co2-monitor-in-their-incubator
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom