So sad there has to be concern about liability in this situation. People should understand the dangers of illness from
any type of animal (there's just as great a risk you'll become infected by dog or cat bites/scratches), and therefore be responsible for deciding to expose their children. Still don't understand the need to sue the pants off everyone for things like this.
Not only that, but as mentioned earlier, I don't consider poultry any "dirtier" than other creatures. Think of rabies threat from some mammals. Healthy youngsters (those with compromised immune systems being the exception) aren't normally going to become sick after handling chickens. As a nation, we aren't exposed to enough outdoor germs, hence why so many catch every sniffle. Farm children who spend time in the mud and kissing birds are probably among the least likely to contract diseases from animals, since their immune systems are tested in daily life. My 3 and 5-year-old brothers next to
never get sick, and you know why I think that is? Because they spend most of their time outside, snuggling our chickens/ducks/turkeys, practically rolling in dirt, and doing what kids thrive on.

Keep in mind, this is not to say we should throw caution to the wind, but simply that worrying about every single germ won't solve anything. In the end, it could even result in a child with little immunity.
~Alex