Quote:
The Bantam Standard says:
PLUMAGE: Slaty blue and white that has a faint bluish gray tinge. Blue in feathers in the form of large irregular shaped blobs as distinct from V-shaped ticking. Main tail feathers and primary wing feathers with a lesser amount of blue than the rest of the plumage. UNDERCOLOR: Slaty blue and sooty white, evenly distributed.
The only time I describe splash using modifiers is in a discussion such as this, or as a part of a non-standard variety name (example, "lemon splash columbian" or "splash mottled." I NEVER call splash "blue splash" or "white splash" or "black splash." Yes, the bird pictured has a great deal of contrast between the dark splashings and the background colouring. It could be paint, but the "spots" seem too small; or it could be exchecquer or mottle.
Variation in background colour and splash colour is determined by melanizers. As a whole, the blue gene is quite variable; since splash is a double dose of the gene, it seems more surprising that significant variation is not more common. There are several current discussions of blue and splash at The-Coop. There is a lot of anecdotal tales of breeding blues to blues or blacks to blues or splash to splash having the characteristic of darkening or lightening the colour (of both blue and splash), but no one has done any empirical testing to verify.
A week ago I heard a rumor at one show about another. It was repeated so many times by so many people that by the time the show was over "the way things are going, I would't be surprised if ..." had become acknowledged "fact" rather than the speculation of the original statement.