Bob Blosl's Heritage Large Fowl Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
[COLOR=FF8C00]Yes, I know this is old lit and may be obsolete in areas. I was looking for clues on how to get rid of a cushion on the female.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=0000FF]==========================[/COLOR]
[COLOR=0000FF]Standard-bred Plymouth Rocks, barred, white, buff, silver penciled ...[/COLOR]

 [COLOR=008000]edited by William Charles Denny[/COLOR]

article within the book:

Plymouth Rocks Under the Standard of 1910

Changes in Standard Type From 1879 to 1910 Illustrated by Composite Outline Sketches. Lower

    Angle of Tail Carriage Recommended and Adopted. Changes That Were Discussed

         But Not Approved. Color Descriptions Improved. Comparison of Fashionable

              Types of Plymouth Rocks, Wyandottes and Rhode Island Reds

By WlLLlAM C. DENNY
http://tinyurl.com/kduuvcw

Pages 17 thru 19.

"The type for females also continued to gain length and depth in body and the tendency to develop a cushion was eliminated."

 Interesting line drawings to illustrate different types of matings to cure breed type problems.

========================
[COLOR=0000FF]The Plymouth Rock standard and breed book: a complete description of all ...[/COLOR]

 B[COLOR=008000]y American Poultry Association,[/COLOR] Arthur Carlton Smith

134 thru  147
http://tinyurl.com/k4mck7j

=============================

 [COLOR=EE82EE]So my question is[/COLOR] does the statement below show a way to get rid of a cushion?
"The type for females also continued to gain length and depth in body and the tendency to develop a cushion was eliminated."

Or is it just a  general statement on the progress of the breed at that time?
 Thanks,
 Karen


Honestly could be either. Length of body could conceivably help with the drop tail issue which would mean less cushion appearance. I do not see how depth of body could be connected.

However I could also see it being just a comment on the state of the birds at the time without it being connected.
 
Yes, I know this is old lit and may be obsolete in areas. I was looking for clues on how to get rid of a cushion on the female.
==========================
Standard-bred Plymouth Rocks, barred, white, buff, silver penciled ...
edited by William Charles Denny

article within the book:
Plymouth Rocks Under the Standard of 1910
Changes in Standard Type From 1879 to 1910 Illustrated by Composite Outline Sketches. Lower
Angle of Tail Carriage Recommended and Adopted. Changes That Were Discussed
But Not Approved. Color Descriptions Improved. Comparison of Fashionable
Types of Plymouth Rocks, Wyandottes and Rhode Island Reds
By WlLLlAM C. DENNY
http://tinyurl.com/kduuvcw
Pages 17 thru 19.
"The type for females also continued to gain length and depth in body and the tendency to develop a cushion was eliminated."
Interesting line drawings to illustrate different types of matings to cure breed type problems.
========================
The Plymouth Rock standard and breed book: a complete description of all ...
By American Poultry Association, Arthur Carlton Smith
134 thru 147
http://tinyurl.com/k4mck7j
=============================
So my question is does the statement below show a way to get rid of a cushion?
"The type for females also continued to gain length and depth in body and the tendency to develop a cushion was eliminated."
Or is it just a general statement on the progress of the breed at that time?
Thanks,
Karen
What date was this discussed ? After the War ?
 
Which war DL?
Probably after the first. That's when the Orp Standard was changed too. It was a matter of what was left to breed from, not a goal to shoot for, as in the original standards.Rocks however, were originated in the US. It took a bit of cheek to change the standard for Orps, being a British breed, that had not been recognized that long.

You think I was there ? Had I been, the Orp standard would never have been changed from it's country of origin.
 
Last edited:
All I can remember and if some one can find a book called the book of knowledge pum\blished by the R I RED club on the net that has pictures by schilling of shreeded feather. The web of the feather need to look like its a duck feather. Tightly webbed you have to pull the feather away from the quill to see separation. You can hold the feather up to the light outside and see the tighnest of the feather and the silkie loos feather is this and is poor in quality. Why do some of these birds get cushions its because they have cochin blood in them from the early days. Even bantams have this as this was the chicken bantam of choice to get a large fowl to a bantam and they used old English to make a bantam.

Now I studied and read a lot of commercial Poultry Books that I had in my collection from Bilobern Farms 40 in all I purchased and over and over they where looking for fast feathering in the wings and tails of the chicks . So I said why not try this idea. Went to the feed store and bought me five Production Reds from Ideal Hatchery. Watched them as they grew up with my reds they where shooting feathers out very fast 7 to 9 days. My reds where for ever coming out. So each year I choose chicks that matured, crowed layer early and after five years I was getting increase egg production, cushions and loose silky feathers gone and the tails or bunny tails in my white rock large fowl disappeared and I started getting that classic Rock lift. Today 20 years latter I see my old strain of pullets on this site with tight webbed feathers my white rock strain which is now in the hands of Mr. Weaver is looking good and hatch like pop corn each year.

When you take this on improving feathering quality its a five year goal and project but worth every dollars as you save money you don't have to hatch so many chicks per year once you get this trait going.

Let me remind you what I learned from Dr. Albert McGraw as in 1959 he got about 20 eggs per mottle java. In I guess twenty years he was getting in his traps 150 eggs per pullet. So it can be done.
 
Quote:
Oh well, Matt, It was an idea at least. Thanks for your input! I did find those line drawings of
different types of matings interesting in that Plymouth Rock book above.
Would Be great of Sussex were shaped like PR.
Best,
Karen
 
Last edited:
Hoping we can carry on two converations...the one on getting rid of cushions on the PR and the Columbian coloring

This is my first year to focus on breeding my flock of six...one rooster, four hens and one daughter. Attempting to utilize what I've learned this year... I was working on getting good type,tail tents, leg color, combs and color contrast and saved for those...building the barn first and then going to add more focus on color for 2014. My plan for next year was to take the rooster back to his daughters and the best cockerel to his mother and aunts.

But, I've been out in the pens today studying birds for undercolor and color on the hackle up to the ear. Since it was mentioned it may take a few years to raise the hackle color up the neck, I want to try setting aside the best matches for accomplishing that as early as possible...or am I trying to do too much at one time....?

The other day I posted pictures of pullets. Today I'll post the two cockerels saved back from this year's breeding...175 hatch. Since I wanted to re-evaluate for hackle to the ear...the best hackle to the ear is on the pullet with the speckles. Comparing these two, the pullet on the left needs more hackle color up the neck to the ears but is a good example of the mother hens and the progeny saved this year (4 nice pullets) that were most in line with my goals. All the pullets have a nice slate blue undercolor on their backs just before the tail feathers


Cockerel 1 is 7.5 months old and has less hackle color but good type, nice broad head, seems to have good stance, good leg color, nice wide body with a good silhouette. Undercolor on the back is a nice slate blue. He looks a lot like his sire and has a nicer comb.



Cockerel 2 is only 5months and has more hackle color up the neck. While his head appears smaller and his comb is underdeveloped for now he does have good good leg color and a developing body. Undercolor is also a nice slate blue on the back. He does have darker down on his rear. Second photo he is fluffing but it shows his primary feathers and tail feathers. Not sure about his lacing on the hackle but his tail feathers have a nice crisp edge.



K 1 on left and K 2 on the right...they are standing on a sloping roof to their coop so it threw their stance off a little



These are the only two cockerels I have saved back but do have 19 chicks 6 - 12 week olds that I have not worked a cull on yet and will be very strict
I'm open to any advice and all suggestions, critiques anyone is willing to offer. I'm in it for the long haul.....
 
Hoping we can carry on two converations...the one on getting rid of cushions on the PR and the Columbian coloring This is my first year to focus on breeding my flock of six...one rooster, four hens and one daughter. Attempting to utilize what I've learned this year... I was working on getting good type,tail tents, leg color, combs and color contrast and saved for those...building the barn first and then going to add more focus on color for 2014. My plan for next year was to take the rooster back to his daughters and the best cockerel to his mother and aunts. But, I've been out in the pens today studying birds for undercolor and color on the hackle up to the ear. Since it was mentioned it may take a few years to raise the hackle color up the neck, I want to try setting aside the best matches for accomplishing that as early as possible...or am I trying to do too much at one time....? The other day I posted pictures of pullets. Today I'll post the two cockerels saved back from this year's breeding...175 hatch. Since I wanted to re-evaluate for hackle to the ear...the best hackle to the ear is on the pullet with the speckles. Comparing these two, the pullet on the left needs more hackle color up the neck to the ears but is a good example of the mother hens and the progeny saved this year (4 nice pullets) that were most in line with my goals. All the pullets have a nice slate blue undercolor on their backs just before the tail feathers Cockerel 1 is 7.5 months old and has less hackle color but good type, nice broad head, seems to have good stance, good leg color, nice wide body with a good silhouette. Undercolor on the back is a nice slate blue. He looks a lot like his sire and has a nicer comb. Cockerel 2 is only 5months and has more hackle color up the neck. While his head appears smaller and his comb is underdeveloped for now he does have good good leg color and a developing body. Undercolor is also a nice slate blue on the back. He does have darker down on his rear. Second photo he is fluffing but it shows his primary feathers and tail feathers. Not sure about his lacing on the hackle but his tail feathers have a nice crisp edge. K 1 on left and K 2 on the right...they are standing on a sloping roof to their coop so it threw their stance off a little These are the only two cockerels I have saved back but do have 19 chicks 6 - 12 week olds that I have not worked a cull on yet and will be very strict I'm open to any advice and all suggestions, critiques anyone is willing to offer. I'm in it for the long haul.....
First cockerel is the superior bodied bird. Don't over complicate. Fix type first, then worry about color fine points. Although obvious color culls like the pullet on the right should still be considered. Backs seem long to me in pictures. Almost more Plymouth Rock then Wyandotte. I have always found this over the years too, you can't fix everything at once, keep workin on getting the type locked in, then the color, especially with a pattern as tricky as Colombian. From what I can see, I would concentrate on getting the type improved, make sure the birds are white where they're supposed to be, but have good dark fluff color at the base of their feathers. Remember even on a patterned bird more than 2/3 of the bird on the scale of points is still shape. Edit: You'll find yourself enjoying the birds more if you don't try an fix it all at once too, which is really what it's all about. Colombian Wyandottes are a big project, glad to see someone tackling them.
 
Last edited:
Little Nana, where did your stock originate? Has anyone seen, or maybe have pictures, of Resse's Columbian Wyandottes? He mentioned having developed a strain, but I've not seen any photos.
 
Probably after the first. That's when the Orp Standard was changed too. It was a matter of what was left to breed from, not a goal to shoot for, as in the original standards.Rocks however, were originated in the US. It took a bit of cheek to change the standard for Orps, being a British breed, that had not been recognized that long.

You think I was there ? Had I been, the Orp standard would never have been changed from it's country of origin.
I always think that too Vickie..It would be the same feeling if the brits changed thier standard on RIR..because of the leftovers they had to gather up and breed from and they suddenly said they no longer needed the brick shape because they had to add something to keep them going, it would be a bit insulting..the RIR is a classic american creation, and his shape is his hallmark.....

If anyone ever lived through such a war and the birds were eaten and not a ton of thought was put into fowl but survival during that time with a world wide plague raging at the same time....the 1819 plague was one of the strangest plagues to ever emerge..it wiped out entire countrysides coffins were piled in the streets, orphanages overflowing.. well over 1/2 of the survivors were left in catatonic state..no one knows why, there was even a movie made about it called awakenings..so there was a lot more to think about than breeding birds during that time...afterward when things calmed down the standard was re-written.there was not a lot of money or people left during that time to re-import birds..just rebuilding lives...I have an old WW1 poster that has litle kids tending poultry from the beginning of the war..it says , its your patriotic duty to keep chickens..but it turned into survival mode..there was no tops grocery..just a country store here or there..you fended for yourself.. I gathered stories from survivors of that plague years ago, for some strange reason, that virus changed the chemistry of the person in such a way that none of them got cancer..long story.just trying to create a picture in peoples minds that things were very tough during that time and after for a long time..

I had a big blk orp given to me years ago..they called her the giant australorp..there is no such thing as a giant australorp..its just what she looked like, there was a trend to lengthen the back to dampen the cushion.this is incorrect.I always turn to the creator of that breed and successors ..they scorned the long back, but wanted a medium back..and they noted this fashion trend in america and were not condoning it..I did use that bird because she had that classic blk orp face and no white ear lobe..good size..some chicks turned out fantastic..but it took about 4 generations to bring them back to medium length..
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom