[COLOR=FF8C00]Yes, I know this is old lit and may be obsolete in areas. I was looking for clues on how to get rid of a cushion on the female.[/COLOR]
[COLOR=0000FF]==========================[/COLOR]
[COLOR=0000FF]Standard-bred Plymouth Rocks, barred, white, buff, silver penciled ...[/COLOR]
[COLOR=008000]edited by William Charles Denny[/COLOR]
article within the book:
Plymouth Rocks Under the Standard of 1910
Changes in Standard Type From 1879 to 1910 Illustrated by Composite Outline Sketches. Lower
Angle of Tail Carriage Recommended and Adopted. Changes That Were Discussed
But Not Approved. Color Descriptions Improved. Comparison of Fashionable
Types of Plymouth Rocks, Wyandottes and Rhode Island Reds
By WlLLlAM C. DENNY
http://tinyurl.com/kduuvcw
Pages 17 thru 19.
"The type for females also continued to gain length and depth in body and the tendency to develop a cushion was eliminated."
Interesting line drawings to illustrate different types of matings to cure breed type problems.
========================
[COLOR=0000FF]The Plymouth Rock standard and breed book: a complete description of all ...[/COLOR]
B[COLOR=008000]y American Poultry Association,[/COLOR] Arthur Carlton Smith
134 thru 147
http://tinyurl.com/k4mck7j
=============================
[COLOR=EE82EE]So my question is[/COLOR] does the statement below show a way to get rid of a cushion?
"The type for females also continued to gain length and depth in body and the tendency to develop a cushion was eliminated."
Or is it just a general statement on the progress of the breed at that time?
Thanks,
Karen
Honestly could be either. Length of body could conceivably help with the drop tail issue which would mean less cushion appearance. I do not see how depth of body could be connected.
However I could also see it being just a comment on the state of the birds at the time without it being connected.