- May 19, 2009
- 8,453
- 3,393
- 512
My original post :
Hi Walt, I need some help. I am sadly confused.
OK, we know one of the breeds used to create the Light Sussex was the Light Brahma. That early elite Light Sussex breeders wrote (circa 1920-30's) to breed Light Sussex the same as the Light Brahma for color.
Books written, 95 to 135 yrs. ago, about breeding Light Brahma seem to me to give breeding advice that will create Light Sussex of the proper color. see Judge Card's book on "Breeding Laws" and this 1877 I.K. Fletch book: The amateur's manual; or, Specific mating of thoroughbred fowls (1877) http://archive.org/details/amateursmanualor00felc . ( Pages 1-16 and 28 thru 32 ) This would seem to confirm that both breeds were then on the same locus, ( eWh? which does not have black stippling on the saddle)
Now it is 2012. I see pics and read books that show Light Brahma with black saddle stippling and that they are based on eb Brown, even tho they are a black and white breed (yes, I see how an eb bird could be black and white). Now it seems, using currently advocated breeding techniques for Light Brahma will result in faulty coloring for Light Sussex ( i.e. black stippling on the saddle, etc.).
What is going on here? Have I made a mistake in my history study?
Have Light Brahma changed locus over the last century?
What do you think of that 1877 Fletch book as regards using the advice Fletch gives for breeding Light Brahma ...for breeding Light Sussex?
Why do Light Brahma have black stippling on the saddle now-a-days?
Could they still be eWh locus like the Light Sussex, yet fashion now decrees they have stippling on the saddle in spite of the fact eWh locus does not usually produce that effect?
I know it's important I understand which breeding method is correct for my Light Sussex or I am going to screw up the color matings.
Thanks so much for your help!
Happy New Year,
Karen
=============================================
New thoughts on the subject above 1/2/13
Hi Walt,
I have been thinking about this. Am reading Van Dort's Colour Genetics" book tonight. I think I may have figured it out. I think it's all about the undercolor. Back around 1900 , reliable authors talk about breeding Light Sussex like Light Brahma. But as we read the Light Brahma lit forward from that point, we start to see the breeders trying to breed the darkest black in the columbian as possible. They start talking about how the different tones of undercolor effects the depth of black color in the top color. I think Light Brahma started out as eWh. But when they started discussing the change in tone of undercolor, I think they inadvertantly switched to eb which gives blue/grey undercolor. While eWh gives pure white undercolor (which is what they had before).
Okay, so we start reading about Light Brahma breeders discussing the amount of "smut" in the undercolor and how the right amount of it creates the darkest black parts in a Columbian bird. But that smut wouldn't even be there in an eWh bird, would it , Walt? So that means they switched from an eWh base to an eb base in the early part of last century?
That's why we can't use modern Light Brahma lit to help us breed Light Sussex? We need to consult the old lit before they switched alleles? Am I anywhere close to right, Walt?
Thanks,
Karen
Hi Walt, I need some help. I am sadly confused.

OK, we know one of the breeds used to create the Light Sussex was the Light Brahma. That early elite Light Sussex breeders wrote (circa 1920-30's) to breed Light Sussex the same as the Light Brahma for color.
Books written, 95 to 135 yrs. ago, about breeding Light Brahma seem to me to give breeding advice that will create Light Sussex of the proper color. see Judge Card's book on "Breeding Laws" and this 1877 I.K. Fletch book: The amateur's manual; or, Specific mating of thoroughbred fowls (1877) http://archive.org/details/amateursmanualor00felc . ( Pages 1-16 and 28 thru 32 ) This would seem to confirm that both breeds were then on the same locus, ( eWh? which does not have black stippling on the saddle)
Now it is 2012. I see pics and read books that show Light Brahma with black saddle stippling and that they are based on eb Brown, even tho they are a black and white breed (yes, I see how an eb bird could be black and white). Now it seems, using currently advocated breeding techniques for Light Brahma will result in faulty coloring for Light Sussex ( i.e. black stippling on the saddle, etc.).
What is going on here? Have I made a mistake in my history study?
Have Light Brahma changed locus over the last century?
What do you think of that 1877 Fletch book as regards using the advice Fletch gives for breeding Light Brahma ...for breeding Light Sussex?
Why do Light Brahma have black stippling on the saddle now-a-days?
Could they still be eWh locus like the Light Sussex, yet fashion now decrees they have stippling on the saddle in spite of the fact eWh locus does not usually produce that effect?
I know it's important I understand which breeding method is correct for my Light Sussex or I am going to screw up the color matings.
Thanks so much for your help!
Happy New Year,
Karen
=============================================
New thoughts on the subject above 1/2/13
Hi Walt,
I have been thinking about this. Am reading Van Dort's Colour Genetics" book tonight. I think I may have figured it out. I think it's all about the undercolor. Back around 1900 , reliable authors talk about breeding Light Sussex like Light Brahma. But as we read the Light Brahma lit forward from that point, we start to see the breeders trying to breed the darkest black in the columbian as possible. They start talking about how the different tones of undercolor effects the depth of black color in the top color. I think Light Brahma started out as eWh. But when they started discussing the change in tone of undercolor, I think they inadvertantly switched to eb which gives blue/grey undercolor. While eWh gives pure white undercolor (which is what they had before).
Okay, so we start reading about Light Brahma breeders discussing the amount of "smut" in the undercolor and how the right amount of it creates the darkest black parts in a Columbian bird. But that smut wouldn't even be there in an eWh bird, would it , Walt? So that means they switched from an eWh base to an eb base in the early part of last century?
That's why we can't use modern Light Brahma lit to help us breed Light Sussex? We need to consult the old lit before they switched alleles? Am I anywhere close to right, Walt?
Thanks,
Karen
Last edited: