"Breeding mutts worsens the poultry hobby for everyone"???

Quote:
I really do not believe selling them would be a problem. Not being honest about what you are sell would though. JMHO
wink.png


Yeah, it is mainly the issue of dishonesty that I think comes into mind when serious breeders think of mutts. For example, as someone involved with Oriental games which are already difficult to find ones worth breeding to begin with, someone will get birds that may end up being crossed and peddle them off onto unsuspecting beginners. "They should of knew the birds they were buying." true, but most people don't even consider that they can't trust someone claiming to have a pure breed that they've bred for years and years when they first begin.

It is also a issue I think, of show poultry breeders whether they admit it or not, that many of them can't help but to despise "designer breeds." For example, I can spend 20 years selecting, breeding, caring, etc. For my fowl, and I could look at them as highly prized fowl, I've worked hard to get them to the status they are; and then someone comes along who has NEVER put any more work into the birds than buying them from a flea market and tossing it in a pen to proclaim, "I've got some Alabama Blues!" And such a case is usually only done to increase the money value, when it is not a pure breed and is misleading.

So someone buys the birds, takes them home, goes to BYC and wants to see if anyone else has heard of them; at which point someone sees the photo and says "Why, it looks like a Andalusian to me." "Wow! My bird really does look like a Andalusian." "Maybe the guy didn't know and just called them Alabama blues?" or perhaps the guy just never told this certain individual they were Alabama blues so the person posts on BYC to see what they are.

Well, then you have them accepting Andalusian blue as the breed name for them, they sell them as that and people trust their honesty because the person may fully believe they are Andalusian's though they may carry as little as 1/4 of that blood; they then sell to a beginner just getting started and again repeat the process of ruining the beginners time and money only to find out later they are not or the blood may be integrated into show quality stock only to ruin it.

I say ruin it, because after awhile, traits will begin to show up. The OEGB in America for example, look at how many low winged, white ear-lobed, brown eyed, etc. Birds are abundantly sold as OEGB when they don't even resemble exactly what a OEGB should- primarily because of the Rosecomb, probably Dutch, Japanese bantam blood, etc. Was added.

If honest, I have no problems with mutts. I like some of them, have bred some of them as well. But I gotta say, designer dogs still irk me and I'm not even a dog breeder. For example, I know someone who had their Pomeranian cross with their Toy (believe it was a Toy) Poodle, and they're so glad they've got "Pomapoo's!" The dog is not a breed, it is a f1 MUTT, and is nowhere near worth 600 dollars and preying upon the lack of common sense in America is mean. However, if you're honest I don't have a problem.

I don't have much problem with someone creating their own breed, as in, if you had a goal set and selected for characteristics to create your own breed, go right ahead. But don't cross it once and call it a "breed." It's not a breed, it is a cross. Varieties, I am also somewhat against, depending on how it is done. Say for example, I wanted a black Brahma, I wouldn't deem it unfit to find a black Malay (which I believe is part of their heritage) and cross it in for numerous generations to set the color in place and making it look like a Brahma in every aspect.

But I would not feel right breeding a black Silkie, or maybe a Sumatra or something, into the Brahma and still calling it a Brahma. Each to their own though, I'll breed what I want how I see fit, you can do whatsoever you want and I never have a issue with it if you're honest.

God bless,
Daniel.

Actually, what something is worth (monetarily) is based entirely upon what someone is willing to pay for it. It may not be a breed, but if it is desirable to enough people and they're willing to pay $600 for it, then it's worth $600 (that's Economics 101 - supply and demand). Now, if your friend paid $600 for a Pomapoo, but the seller really sold her something else - that's the problem. Also, if the OP were taking her chickens to unsuspecting purebreed breeders' homes and letting them rendezvous with their flock and messing up their breeding program, that'd be another problem (I feel it's probably safe to assume this is not the case). None of these breeders are being forced to buy the mixed breed birds that are being sold (e.g. I prefer red grapes to green, so I buy red and I don't think the produce guy is going to sneak any green ones into my bag because he has some sort of green grape agenda). So, short of sellers lying about what they're selling (and for those who do, shame on you!), people should fill free to mix and sell whatever chickens they so choose. I know this post sounds argumentative (as all voiceless words on a screen usually do), but it's not meant that way. In fact, your main point was to just be honest and on that we absolutely agree. I simply needed to point out that (maybe not to you) your friend's dog is worth $600 simply because that is what you're friend paid for it.
 
I can see the OP's point but I sort of agree with the long-winded poster - I'd be to be really upset if I bought 'pure' something-chicks and they turned out to be crosses.

...Like these silkies. /eyes them.

I think that people should be educated on the breeds, yes, and this particular woman did have a crap ton of full grown silkies on her property so I doubt I'll wake up one morning with an EE. But, still! EE is actually a perfect example, they constantly get mislabeled and then sold as Ameraucanas/Araucanas. I mean, there are at LEAST 2-3 threads in the Breed/Gender forum that pop up every day with someone who thought they had a pure chicken and ended up with a EE.

And for some people hatching eggs don't always work out (this is from experience, lol). I'm honestly scared to try to hatch again after this debacle, which is why I ended up going the local route, and as someone who has never had anything besides EE mutts from the flea market but is looking to maybe show or something later on down the road, it's very frustrating that there is such a lack of knowledge about breed conformation.
sad.png


With that being said, while I don't think mutts 'RUIN' the breed I think oftentimes they promote a lot of misinformation. To be honest though, I feel the same way about puppy mills and hatchery birds- they're not being bred to have good conformation, especially in dogs, they're just being mass produced for profit. It's very misleading and discouraging for someone who's a total newbie. I just want to have a good start with healthy and decent looking stock.
 
I like my mutts. They are the funniest little things. I have NO IDEA what some of them are even! I didn't breed them. I got them free cuz the lady who got them didn't want "that" in her flock. All the better for me! And I don't care if they turn out to be lawn ornaments. They atleast kepe the bug pop down. SO, they are good birds. They don't lay yet, so don't know what type of layers they will be, but they earn their keep by keeping me happy. Oscar-Roo, and Skeeter, Skooter, Skatter-pullets. The cutest little cochins mutts. And then there is What.. a pullet.. She's name What, cuz I don' t know WHAT she is, But she has feathery feet and the prettiest colors. I haven't seen another girl like her.
 
Quote:
I doubt this will come as any surprise to anyone. I've often seen this statement on the internet, and it's just as simplistic and wrong now as ever.

Just because I find someone that wants to pay $1500 for my dog still doesn't make it worth that. If I can get a $100 dog, and breed it to a dog that I paid $125 for, and if that is the actual value of said dogs, i.e. the most common price, the puppies are not going to be "worth" $1500 no matter what anyone says, in the context of this discussion.

But to get back on track, yes, I think the issue of selling mutts as purebreds is the issue. Not simply owning them. The fella that the OP had the discussion with was confused on that.
 
I suppose the is room for everyone to be right on this issue. Here is where I will weigh in. If picky people really want to split hairs all their blue blooded purebreds are muts also. If not where did sexlinks come from how about australorps or americanas or oegb or any of them. Mixing existing breeds that were available at the time. So with that said if their pure breed birds are so valueable to them they should sterilize them so that they have the only ones that exist. And while they are at it destroy all known birds that they used to create said MUTT! I will continue to raise breed harvest and reap all benefits from my mutts. Thanks for reading my opinion guys!
 
Quote:
yuckyuck.gif


Again, I have read through each post that the OP made. I don't see anywhere that she (?) said that she was breeding mutts to sell (except for selling extras at auction). What she said in post #56 was "To be honest, I don't know where the homing thing came up. He just brought it up when I was asking a question about broodies. One of the BR roos we hatched out did end up as food (his feet were delicious) and the rest went to an auction. 4 sold for $20 total, pretty good to me. And we kept one, his name is Norbert. Any chickens we don't want or need go to the auction. They sell. I don't expect them to be all pets either. I know all these things, don't worry."

If you have a muttphobia, I wouldn't suggest buying your birds at an auction. As a former co-owner of an auction house I can tell you that unless the auctioneer tells you that you are buying purebred you can expect nothing except that the birds you are buying are chickens.

What's the old caveat? Let the buyer beware.
 
Quote:
I doubt this will come as any surprise to anyone. I've often seen this statement on the internet, and it's just as simplistic and wrong now as ever.

Just because I find someone that wants to pay $1500 for my dog still doesn't make it worth that. If I can get a $100 dog, and breed it to a dog that I paid $125 for, and if that is the actual value of said dogs, i.e. the most common price, the puppies are not going to be "worth" $1500 no matter what anyone says, in the context of this discussion.

But to get back on track, yes, I think the issue of selling mutts as purebreds is the issue. Not simply owning them. The fella that the OP had the discussion with was confused on that.

Sometimes I buy pre-packaged foods at the store. They may charge $5 for something whose ingredients and cost to produce were only $2, but if the demand is there then they can sell it for $5 which means it's worth $5. If people won't pay $5 for it, then the demand isn't there and they'll have to lower their price - let's say to $4. If people are then willing to pay $4, then it's worth $4. I couldn't go to the manufacturer and say, "this isn't worth $5. It only costs you $2 to make." They'd let me know that I don't have to buy it. They'll sell it to someone else for $5 as long enough people are out there willing to pay that.
 
Last edited:
Who said this? I feel to each his or her own unless you are trying to pass them off as a purebred. 90% of my birds are mutts ( EE mutts ) and I love them. So I guess this is what I have to say to him.
smack.gif
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom