Quote:
They are many yrs removed from Urch and don't look anything like his strain now.
I'd have to say Sand Hill needs to be given credit for the results of their own breeding program.  
We also got Black Ameraucanas from them which their catalog stated were from two show lines.  One of the birds had multi-colored feathering.  Another had no facial feathers and a single comb.  Another had more correct plumage, but incorrect leg color.  I am guessing their original birds were from two show lines, no one has lied, but the current breeding program is not consistently producing show winners.
I know any breeding program is going to throw the off bird from time to time and I probably just got som bad luck.  I'm just saying it probably does not take more than a generation or two of bad combination choices to result in poorer quality birds than what you started with.  So once you start selecting and breeding your own birds, you need to be judged by your own results, rather than those of a source flock even one generation away.
At this moment, I am not that impressed with Sand Hill's show quality, but they are propagating breeds that might otherwise disappear.  The birds were healthy, they lay fine, and the folks were easy to deal with.  I'm not going to knock them too hard as a hatchery.  Just need to match our expectations to what they can honestly provide.  
I am gathering that Mr. Urch's birds will be of a different stamp, but I would still have to get possibly 25 chicks to find a trio of pullets that I could start my flock with.  And all coming from the same flock, any rooster would be at least half-sibling, so I have to look for a roo from elsewhere (maybe my JamesA bird will improve? 
		
		
	
	
 ).