- Thread starter
- #11
Actually, Mom's first assumption was that he had cheated somehow. She's been working with teens for years (mostly pregnant unwed ones but I digress) so she is not the type to assume that her son was innocent! More the contrary, but when she spoke to the teacher the teacher herself said he had not done anything else to warrant the expulsion from the test. Simply that he had as horsejody said - not followed directions.
To wreck the kid's GPA seems pretty harsh for that kind of lesson.
I think Mom is planning on a meeting with the principle on Monday because the discussion with the teacher went no where. The teacher refused to even consider a make up exam. He got an F. I just couldn't help wonder if there wasn't some kind of lesson she was trying to teach other than follow directions y'know? Like, ever read Frindle?? By being so rigid the teacher was actually helping the kid. What could be the corollary?
To wreck the kid's GPA seems pretty harsh for that kind of lesson.
I think Mom is planning on a meeting with the principle on Monday because the discussion with the teacher went no where. The teacher refused to even consider a make up exam. He got an F. I just couldn't help wonder if there wasn't some kind of lesson she was trying to teach other than follow directions y'know? Like, ever read Frindle?? By being so rigid the teacher was actually helping the kid. What could be the corollary?