Quote:
Bless your heart!!!
Bless your heart!!!
Cancer - Are They Hiding The Cure For Profit?
- Thread starter Galen Bontrager
- Start date
Quote:
PurpleChicken
Rest in Peace 1970-2018
I remember debating this tired old topic when I was around 12.
Yup, there's a cure. It's hidden in the flying saucer at Roswell.
Once the OP referenced Sicko there was no way to debate such brilliance.
Anyone have any chickens??
Yup, there's a cure. It's hidden in the flying saucer at Roswell.
Once the OP referenced Sicko there was no way to debate such brilliance.
Anyone have any chickens??
If they had a cure Farrah Fawcett and Patrick Swayze would not have died from it. But look at the list of people who would be out of a job...Oncologists, the people who make the Chemo and Rad seeds..
They finally may have a working vaccine for Aids now that cancer is more prevalent.
Who know? I for one wish they did! I remember reading in a cancer mag in the oncologists office that in 2010 cancer is going to be the number one killer of people. I can't quite remember the percent, but I believe it was in the 70%.
They finally may have a working vaccine for Aids now that cancer is more prevalent.
Who know? I for one wish they did! I remember reading in a cancer mag in the oncologists office that in 2010 cancer is going to be the number one killer of people. I can't quite remember the percent, but I believe it was in the 70%.
- Thread starter
- #35
- Jul 2, 2009
- 22
- 0
- 22
Quote:
"There is a cure for cancer". I never forget my mother who was sitting in front of the tv when a special report came up on the screen saying, "Finally, a cure for cancer, news at 11". The news came on at 11 but nothing more was mentioned of it. Not one thing!!!!
That was 25 yrs ago and we will never forget it! I wonder who called the news station and told them to shut up? Somebody did!
"There is a cure for cancer". I never forget my mother who was sitting in front of the tv when a special report came up on the screen saying, "Finally, a cure for cancer, news at 11". The news came on at 11 but nothing more was mentioned of it. Not one thing!!!!
That was 25 yrs ago and we will never forget it! I wonder who called the news station and told them to shut up? Somebody did!
- Thread starter
- #36
- Jul 2, 2009
- 22
- 0
- 22
Quote:
God Bless you
God Bless you
- Thread starter
- #37
- Jul 2, 2009
- 22
- 0
- 22
My Mum had cancer but we beat it with Essiac and a change of diet. Now my Dad is terminal with a tumour in his sinus. He's 74 and has a host of problems, so it's his time and I'm ok with it. No way in hell will he be going with the cancer though. On a morphine driver? No way, no how.
Every single 'chronic metabolic' disease in history has been found ultimately to be down to a dietary deficiency. Scurvy killed millions till Vit C cured it. Pellagra crippled whole countries until they discovered it was vit B3 (niacin). The medical establishment of the day insisted it must be a virus. Pernicious Anaemia had a 98% mortality rate, which is higher than cancer ever was. When a couple of doctors told their patients to eat raw liver and they were cured, it was dismissed as quakery. Eventually they discovered it was down to Vit B12 and folic acid.
Cancer is also a chronic metabolic disease, and again the biochemists have found the solution - but again it's being ignored and people are dying needlessly. Vit B17. The concentrated form is called laetrille. Our diets are lacking in this in the West. Remember the old saying "an apple a day keeps the doctor away"? There is nothing special about apples that you couldn't say about strawberries or some other fruit. So why an apple? People used to eat the seeds. Those seeds contain B17 in high amounts (as do all seeds except citrus). There is also small amounts of cyanide in there and that's what kills the cancer cells - and what has given the medical frauds the excuse to warn people off it. To claim the cyanide in these seeds is dangerous, is no different to claiming water is dangerous because it contains hydrogen. Or table salt is dangerous because it contains the poison chloride. It is fraudulent science. (Of course if you are a moron and ate hundreds of seeds on their own you might possibly get cyanide poisoning - there is such a claim but nobody has ever traced this fella. Just eat the seeds when you eat the fruit. Apricot kernels vary in how many you can take, but do your research and don't scarf them down like an idiot.)
However, in order to be able to use B17 properly you must have sufficient zinc in your body (leafy veggies, pumpkin seeds etc). And don't forget in order to repair cells in the first place, you need sufficient Vit C. Diet. Diet. Diet.
It's right about cannabis; the Spanish have done much research on THCs ability to kill cancer cells, but if you or a loved one are battling this dreadful disease it's hard to get hold of. Have a google for Rick Simpson (Run From The Cure) he was making an oil from cannabis and curing various people in Canada till they arrested him. It's grotesque.
The very least you need to do to prevent and/or fight cancer is make sure you eat fruits with seeds and eat the lot. Eat lots of green veggies like broccoli, and have a few apricot kernels a day (quite a few if you have cancer). The FDA in America have made that kind of hard though, and it's getting harder over here too. They put Jason Vale in prison for selling apricot kernels. He had cancer himself and became such a zealot he actually became a spammer to get his message out. Have a look at his website. http://www.apricotsfromgod.info/mystory.htm
It's not just stupidity this time, like in the past, this time it's about money. Previously medical discoveries were handed to science and the discoverer and the University who'd funded the reasearch got the credit. Now much research is funded by the drug companies themselves and they have an exclusive patent. Natural products and diets can't be patented. I remember a BBC article in 2000 that stated scientist were using cyanide to target cancer cells, but leave normal cells untouched. This is exactly what B17 does! So if they can make a synthetic version they can make a fortune. Except they won't, as they can't afford to destroy a billion dollar business with a cure. Get real!
Reps of BigPharma sit on the advisory boards of the various "Cancer Societies" around the world. They assure us it's voluntary and unpaid so no conflict of interest. Riiight!! 90% of peer reviewed papers in the medical journals are written by doctors who have some link to BigPharma. The OP thinks Government would be interested in cures, but if that were so they would not allow BigPharma to fund the research. They would not allow medical colleges to be funded by "donations" from BigPharma steering the 'research' in a direction that suits them (in fact students at Harvard Medical School recently held protest meetings at the incestuous relationship between the drug companies and the scientific direction they were being taught). It is they who dictate medical policy. The BMA, FDA, and their equivalents around the world are utterly corrupt. An example recently was the Government chief Medical Officer running round the media advising we have to get the Swine Flu jab. Turns out he was being paid £166,000 a year (around $200,000) by one of the drug companies who stood to profit. But don't worry he assured us there was no conflict of interest, so that's alright then.
Google iatrogenic illnesses. It means 'doctor induced' and the bulk is down to long term side effects from prescribed drugs. 40,000 people in the UK die every year because of long term drug side effects, 200,000 have their quality of life seriously impaired. Those were the BMAs own figures from 2002. In the US it's around 150,000 deaths and over a million impaired. Every year for nearly 60 years. Add those figures up and it's worthy of Stalin. And nobody does anything!!
The drug industry definitely doesn't want a cure, they want to control things. In fact many of them have said that we will only be able to control it in the future, never cure it. You can live with your tumour, but you'll have to spend the rest of your life on expensive drugs. This will cripple nationalised health services like Britain or Canada and rationing will be brought in, and those dependant on insurance in the US will likely have difficulty.
I remember reading a Canadian article that said if cancer was ever cured the Canadian economy would collapse. It's such a huge industry, chemo cost a fortune, radiation, etc etc and you have millions using these services! 88 million people in the US alone are going to die each year - and that's after most of them have done the expensive chemo/radiation. Christ it's such a cesspit!
Politicians are lining their own pockets as usual and don't care about us. No Government would ever have the guts to cut that viper loose. Don't forget if the drug industries weren't funding research, Government would have to do it again and they don't seem keen on that.
Does that mean the average Doctor undertands what's going on? No. Most of the time he's too busy doctoring and trusts his bosses to be giving him the correct information. He believes the science, and the motives. He has no idea of the level of corruption. Medicine is owned body and soul by the corporate world.
Many are looking at other options for their patients but they find themselves in trouble with the medical authorities if they don't follow the slash and burn model. Apparently 70% of the worlds top oncologists would NOT have chemo if they had cancer, yet they lack the courage to inform their patients of other options (a bit like 61% of doctors and 74% of nurses over here won't have the swine flu jab because of safety fears, but they are still gonna give it to their patients - so much for medical ethics! )
God I'm so sick of watching people die unneccesarily. I tried to get this alternate info to a neighbour and he just wouldn't listen. He could have done it alongside chemo if he didn't have the courage to go alternative, but those who use chemo alone have the worst survival rates, do the research. He died.
1 in 3 are likely to get cancer in the future, so please, if it touches your life, research everything you can and don't just depend on the medical profession. Remember, they can't even remember their own historical precedents for metabolic diseases and diet, so you're ultimately at the mercy of ignorance.
Every single 'chronic metabolic' disease in history has been found ultimately to be down to a dietary deficiency. Scurvy killed millions till Vit C cured it. Pellagra crippled whole countries until they discovered it was vit B3 (niacin). The medical establishment of the day insisted it must be a virus. Pernicious Anaemia had a 98% mortality rate, which is higher than cancer ever was. When a couple of doctors told their patients to eat raw liver and they were cured, it was dismissed as quakery. Eventually they discovered it was down to Vit B12 and folic acid.
Cancer is also a chronic metabolic disease, and again the biochemists have found the solution - but again it's being ignored and people are dying needlessly. Vit B17. The concentrated form is called laetrille. Our diets are lacking in this in the West. Remember the old saying "an apple a day keeps the doctor away"? There is nothing special about apples that you couldn't say about strawberries or some other fruit. So why an apple? People used to eat the seeds. Those seeds contain B17 in high amounts (as do all seeds except citrus). There is also small amounts of cyanide in there and that's what kills the cancer cells - and what has given the medical frauds the excuse to warn people off it. To claim the cyanide in these seeds is dangerous, is no different to claiming water is dangerous because it contains hydrogen. Or table salt is dangerous because it contains the poison chloride. It is fraudulent science. (Of course if you are a moron and ate hundreds of seeds on their own you might possibly get cyanide poisoning - there is such a claim but nobody has ever traced this fella. Just eat the seeds when you eat the fruit. Apricot kernels vary in how many you can take, but do your research and don't scarf them down like an idiot.)
However, in order to be able to use B17 properly you must have sufficient zinc in your body (leafy veggies, pumpkin seeds etc). And don't forget in order to repair cells in the first place, you need sufficient Vit C. Diet. Diet. Diet.
It's right about cannabis; the Spanish have done much research on THCs ability to kill cancer cells, but if you or a loved one are battling this dreadful disease it's hard to get hold of. Have a google for Rick Simpson (Run From The Cure) he was making an oil from cannabis and curing various people in Canada till they arrested him. It's grotesque.
The very least you need to do to prevent and/or fight cancer is make sure you eat fruits with seeds and eat the lot. Eat lots of green veggies like broccoli, and have a few apricot kernels a day (quite a few if you have cancer). The FDA in America have made that kind of hard though, and it's getting harder over here too. They put Jason Vale in prison for selling apricot kernels. He had cancer himself and became such a zealot he actually became a spammer to get his message out. Have a look at his website. http://www.apricotsfromgod.info/mystory.htm
It's not just stupidity this time, like in the past, this time it's about money. Previously medical discoveries were handed to science and the discoverer and the University who'd funded the reasearch got the credit. Now much research is funded by the drug companies themselves and they have an exclusive patent. Natural products and diets can't be patented. I remember a BBC article in 2000 that stated scientist were using cyanide to target cancer cells, but leave normal cells untouched. This is exactly what B17 does! So if they can make a synthetic version they can make a fortune. Except they won't, as they can't afford to destroy a billion dollar business with a cure. Get real!
Reps of BigPharma sit on the advisory boards of the various "Cancer Societies" around the world. They assure us it's voluntary and unpaid so no conflict of interest. Riiight!! 90% of peer reviewed papers in the medical journals are written by doctors who have some link to BigPharma. The OP thinks Government would be interested in cures, but if that were so they would not allow BigPharma to fund the research. They would not allow medical colleges to be funded by "donations" from BigPharma steering the 'research' in a direction that suits them (in fact students at Harvard Medical School recently held protest meetings at the incestuous relationship between the drug companies and the scientific direction they were being taught). It is they who dictate medical policy. The BMA, FDA, and their equivalents around the world are utterly corrupt. An example recently was the Government chief Medical Officer running round the media advising we have to get the Swine Flu jab. Turns out he was being paid £166,000 a year (around $200,000) by one of the drug companies who stood to profit. But don't worry he assured us there was no conflict of interest, so that's alright then.
Google iatrogenic illnesses. It means 'doctor induced' and the bulk is down to long term side effects from prescribed drugs. 40,000 people in the UK die every year because of long term drug side effects, 200,000 have their quality of life seriously impaired. Those were the BMAs own figures from 2002. In the US it's around 150,000 deaths and over a million impaired. Every year for nearly 60 years. Add those figures up and it's worthy of Stalin. And nobody does anything!!
The drug industry definitely doesn't want a cure, they want to control things. In fact many of them have said that we will only be able to control it in the future, never cure it. You can live with your tumour, but you'll have to spend the rest of your life on expensive drugs. This will cripple nationalised health services like Britain or Canada and rationing will be brought in, and those dependant on insurance in the US will likely have difficulty.
I remember reading a Canadian article that said if cancer was ever cured the Canadian economy would collapse. It's such a huge industry, chemo cost a fortune, radiation, etc etc and you have millions using these services! 88 million people in the US alone are going to die each year - and that's after most of them have done the expensive chemo/radiation. Christ it's such a cesspit!
Politicians are lining their own pockets as usual and don't care about us. No Government would ever have the guts to cut that viper loose. Don't forget if the drug industries weren't funding research, Government would have to do it again and they don't seem keen on that.
Does that mean the average Doctor undertands what's going on? No. Most of the time he's too busy doctoring and trusts his bosses to be giving him the correct information. He believes the science, and the motives. He has no idea of the level of corruption. Medicine is owned body and soul by the corporate world.
Many are looking at other options for their patients but they find themselves in trouble with the medical authorities if they don't follow the slash and burn model. Apparently 70% of the worlds top oncologists would NOT have chemo if they had cancer, yet they lack the courage to inform their patients of other options (a bit like 61% of doctors and 74% of nurses over here won't have the swine flu jab because of safety fears, but they are still gonna give it to their patients - so much for medical ethics! )
God I'm so sick of watching people die unneccesarily. I tried to get this alternate info to a neighbour and he just wouldn't listen. He could have done it alongside chemo if he didn't have the courage to go alternative, but those who use chemo alone have the worst survival rates, do the research. He died.
1 in 3 are likely to get cancer in the future, so please, if it touches your life, research everything you can and don't just depend on the medical profession. Remember, they can't even remember their own historical precedents for metabolic diseases and diet, so you're ultimately at the mercy of ignorance.
I dont know about anyone else..but thank you for all that info. It made me see things in a different light. Thanks.
*going to get B17 and zinc...and apples and...*
*going to get B17 and zinc...and apples and...*
Quote:
Did you check any of my links? Ever hear of the diseases of civilization theory? Gary Taubes writes about it in his book good calories bad calories.
"Through their direct effect on insulin and blood sugar, refined carbohydrates, starches and sugars are the dietary cause of coronary heart disease and diabetes. They are most likely dietary causes of cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and the other chronic diseases of civilization."
http://jollyblogger.typepad.com/jollyblogger/2008/06/gary-taubes-top.html
Wifezilla, with all due respect - I have taken EVERY biology class under the sun including many many many nutrition classes. NOT diet classes, nutrition classes - as in biochemistry. I also have a masters degree in toxicology. So, I won't get into it with you because it serves no purpose. I respect your beliefs, but I think they are wrong. In addition, when looking for sources, try this database instead of bloggers: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Did you check any of my links? Ever hear of the diseases of civilization theory? Gary Taubes writes about it in his book good calories bad calories.
"Through their direct effect on insulin and blood sugar, refined carbohydrates, starches and sugars are the dietary cause of coronary heart disease and diabetes. They are most likely dietary causes of cancer, Alzheimer's disease, and the other chronic diseases of civilization."
http://jollyblogger.typepad.com/jollyblogger/2008/06/gary-taubes-top.html
Wifezilla, with all due respect - I have taken EVERY biology class under the sun including many many many nutrition classes. NOT diet classes, nutrition classes - as in biochemistry. I also have a masters degree in toxicology. So, I won't get into it with you because it serves no purpose. I respect your beliefs, but I think they are wrong. In addition, when looking for sources, try this database instead of bloggers: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Last edited:
so here in canada we also pay taixes in my prvince we pay 13% others pay 5%,it verys because we have HST and PST we have free helth care and schools , but the problem is we have no room in the hapitals anymore.so any way here in canada if there is a cure it would save m the gov money, and also if there was and was covered by helth( can't spell it ) it would raise taxs up up.
Similar threads
New posts New threads Active threads
-
Latest threads
-
Broken shoulder and dying wing flesh
- Started by Joneil7
- Replies: 0
-
-
Hen with cancer started laying again ??
- Started by guest226
- Replies: 0
-
-
Wheaten Marans chicks with head stripes- Started by AusHen
- Replies: 0
-
-
Threads with more replies in the last 15 days
-
-
-
Prettiest chicken breeds and plumage color- Started by Beau plus penny
- Replies: 46
-
Question of the Day - Thursday, August 21st, 2025- Started by casportpony
- Replies: 46
-
-
