The possibility exists that the prosecution could appeal.
I don't think they have anything to base an appeal on, though.
An appeal is NOT a second trial. In an appeal, the judges on the appeal committee, can decide to undo the verdict of the original trial. It's like a committee review of whether the original trial was done properly.
That would mean the appeal judges would read the case, and the prosecution would have to answer questions.
The coverage of the case was indeed, terrible. It was ridiculous.
Legal experts were saying MONTHS ago that there was not enough evidence to convict.
It was the idiotic news media that set up the expectations to the public, that this was such a solid case - and now the public feels cheated. Lay the blame on the Nancy Graces and other non-experts who made it seem like this was such a strong case.
It was NOT.
IF the public had been told the truth from the start(that the prosecution did NOT have the type of evidence it needed for a conviction of murder 1), they would not now be so upset and angry.
Lawyers who know nothing about the case and don't have the experience to analyze what's going on, should NOT comment on these cases.
These legal loudmouths do the public NO favors.