- Thread starter
- #11
Before this blows into an out-of-control hysteria amongst a few members, I need to clarify a couple of points about my video. First--specifically to chickenannie and Southern28Chick--ladies, you need to be much more careful in your observations. Regardless of whether you were titillated by it or not, my neighbor in the blue shirt was not "scratching himself." He has the most curious childlike habit of quickly fidgeting and wringing his hands together when he laughs hard. It's just that when you bring your hands together in front of yourself, they end up exactly where God put them....at arms length away. Squarely in your lap! So please let's not have any more comments that far off base.
Regarding the father "forcing" his son to feed the chicken, I could not agree with you more that it would have been pushing the situation way too far....which is why I stopped him. I was trying to capture a situation that just happened to happen. I was not trying, or interested in, pushing up a childs fear level. Let's keep in mind that in reality the child was in zero level of danger. What made the video funny to me was the irrational correlation between reality and the child's perception. While we had a few good laughs at his "expense" let's not forget that there was an important lesson being learned. To all of the women who would have yanked this child quickly out of this situation of zero actual danger, I submit that you would have needlessly prolonged his irrational fear for an indefinite period of time. If you watched the third video you would know that this childs fear level went from 95%+ at the beginning down to about 25-30% by the end. Yet this is not the end of my psychomeddling! I want this child to have a fear level in the 5-10% range. I guess you could say that I subscribe to the late Steve Irwin's theory of preparation for bravery, except for the fact that I'm "dangling" little boys over chickens instead of crocodiles. But the principle is the same. This very afternoon this same boy petted a chicken--and smiled--while I held it. So, at least to me, great progress has been made.
Regarding the father "forcing" his son to feed the chicken, I could not agree with you more that it would have been pushing the situation way too far....which is why I stopped him. I was trying to capture a situation that just happened to happen. I was not trying, or interested in, pushing up a childs fear level. Let's keep in mind that in reality the child was in zero level of danger. What made the video funny to me was the irrational correlation between reality and the child's perception. While we had a few good laughs at his "expense" let's not forget that there was an important lesson being learned. To all of the women who would have yanked this child quickly out of this situation of zero actual danger, I submit that you would have needlessly prolonged his irrational fear for an indefinite period of time. If you watched the third video you would know that this childs fear level went from 95%+ at the beginning down to about 25-30% by the end. Yet this is not the end of my psychomeddling! I want this child to have a fear level in the 5-10% range. I guess you could say that I subscribe to the late Steve Irwin's theory of preparation for bravery, except for the fact that I'm "dangling" little boys over chickens instead of crocodiles. But the principle is the same. This very afternoon this same boy petted a chicken--and smiled--while I held it. So, at least to me, great progress has been made.