Or is it? Consider the motivations. Does a positive test in our benefit mean more money? Cogs keep turning but only if someone rewinds them. There are dastardly things a foot. There is more than meets the eyes as one could see. One must consider the motive when it comes to crimes to identify the true motive. Ultimately we end up back on the same precusipus. Conduct how you wish this interpretation but this is how I conclude the facts to existBut if big pharma did their own testing, folks would say they fudged it, faked it, skewed it, lied about it. So they can't win, can they? If outside agencies do the testing nobody can say they had any influence on it. It's independently tested, which sounds like a good thing to me.