I thought it was interesting. Until there is better evidence, if there ever is on what other health complications were involved in each death we're guessing. There is also the matter of differentiating between which groups contract the virus and which groups die from it.
There are always going to be outlying points around the median which people will drag up, but the median does seem to comprise the more elderly with other health concerns. As has been pointed out by a number of scientists, if everyone could be tested then we would see a much reduced death rate v infection rate. Many people will have contracted the virus and not even know they have it, putting it down to a touch of winter flu.
The business about China is quite complex. China due to it's social and political nature can do things that the democratic countries can't. They don't for example have to consider what thhe electorate may think of their response, or worry about the cost. They can mobilise millions without negotiation regarding wages and individual rights. A bit like a colony of ants. The instructions come down the line and everybody carries them out. So, they could build hospital units in days and completely shut down particular areas very easily.
One doesn't have to approve of the system to acknowledge it's strengths and weaknesses.
I think Russia will be similar in that they will want to keep the economy healthy by maintaining production while we in the West will be shutting ours down in order to protect our workforce.
From what I've read (all information we read from both China and Russia comes through western media largely so one must bear this in mind) Russia has shut it's borders and even go so far as to prevent airlines flying to anywhere apart from designated airports where everyone who enters the country gets tested, a bit like the disinfection of incoming travels to Australia a while back.
We, The West, are not doing any of this.
I find the whole business fascinating.