Coronavirus, Covid 19 Discussion and How It Has Affected Your Daily Life Chat Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
My current claims are as follows:

1) masks reduce, but do not entirely, eliminate the spread of respiratory viruses, including, but not limited to, CoVID-19.

2) Vaccination reduces the frequency and severity of CoVID illnesses.

3) critical public health messaging was perverted by both past and current administration to serve the stock market. This claim is more subjective, so I am willing to field much speculation on the matter.

1) and 2) I will follow up with using references such as medical reviews, and commentary from trusted hospitals such as Johns Hopkins. I can field other questions in the meantime. I'm trying to keep each post short and sweet
 
You may as well skip the "commentary from trusted hospitals such as Johns Hopkins." That rarely, if ever, comes out as anything but "safe and effective" as a statement with no studies to back it up. Or studies cited but the numbers in the studies support the opposite conclusion.

Of course, if there is "commentary" that is backed up, that is a different thing.
 
You may as well skip the "commentary from trusted hospitals such as Johns Hopkins." That rarely, if ever, comes out as anything but "safe and effective" as a statement with no studies to back it up. Or studies cited but the numbers in the studies support the opposite conclusion.

Of course, if there is "commentary" that is backed up, that is a different thing.
I'll keep that in mind. Can you help me define who trusted sources would be? I have had exchanges before where ĺthe entire field of science was indicted.
 
Last edited:
You say that mask reduce the transmission of viruses. By how much do they think this happens and is it worth the humiliation and devastating effects on children in particular?

The usefulness of the vaccines were completely misrepresented at ALL levels of government, media and "experts". Now the speculation is that they reduce the severity of the infection. How is it possible to know who's body will overreact to the virus.

Why were the recommendations on how to fight the pandemic ignored and procedures introduced that were the complete opposite.
 
You say that mask reduce the transmission of viruses. By how much do they think this happens and is it worth the humiliation and devastating effects on children in particular?

The usefulness of the vaccines were completely misrepresented at ALL levels of government, media and "experts". Now the speculation is that they reduce the severity of the infection. How is it possible to know who's body will overreact to the virus.

Why were the recommendations on how to fight the pandemic ignored and procedures introduced that were the complete opposite.
My short answer is that Washington is too chickenshit to enact proper cordon sanitaire. What the CDC agency heads were telling the media did NOT line up at all with what we were doing to protect our own. The labs had rigid shifts with specific cohorts swapping out every other day so we wouldn't expose each other. HR literally paid us 10 hours every week to stay the hell away from work and each other so we could look after our kids and elderly.

As for vaccine efficacy:
2) vaccination helps, but may not be as good against newer variants as you have noted (hence my initial remark about high mutation rates in respiratory viruses): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2791601

An earlier Danish study noting reduction of CoVID transmission in vaccinated households: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41...effectiveness,when they were fully vaccinated.

2a) the claim that "most cases of CoVID are in vaccinated people" is technically correct. However, this observation ignores epidemiology! As of early 2022, nearly 80% of the adults in the USA have had their two-shot primary series. Yes most new cases of CoVID may occur in the now-vaccinated population. "Isn't this proof that the vaccines don't work?" you may ask. No. The people who get sick, in spite of being fully vaccinated, represent a vastly smaller percentage than those who got sick while unvaccinated.

https://www.kff.org/policy-watch/why-do-vaccinated-people-represent-most-covid-19-deaths-right-now/
 
That is exactly what they did do though.
YES!

But if it was taken more seriously from the beginning maybe would have been a much shorter disruption instead of now 3 years with no end in sight. All the civil unrest, people so angry and violent, shortages of common but necessary things. It just seems to go on and on.
 
I remember those first weeks. I was moved to the ICU working 7-12's. But are you saying the country should have locked down even tighter, like China or Australia? Again, this was the opposite of the recommended procedures.

Why do they believe the possible, marginal benefits of the vaccine is better than the blood embolisms, pneumonia, cardiomyopathy people are experiencing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom