I did learn quite a lot from the experience and if you are really dedicated and interested, all obstacles can be overcome with patience, practice and funds. I don't mean to discourage you if you want to go for it, just passing on my take from the experiment.
although not on the collecting end, some years ago we did an AI program for our registered cattle, including checking for heat every 6-hours - hiring an Texas A&M PHd to do the actual AI work, juggling schedules, the expenses etc. We had great success, and moved our herd genetics forward. At the end, we discovered that getting a really good bull - is a more successful and economical and far less stressful to the the animals (and to us) approach. We decided a really good male is worth it -- because he will be on the job 24/7 and 'will work for food'. That's one reason that a registered bull will sell for $9,000 and up .. if he is the grand champion at an registered cattle auction
It wasn't that above referenced post, but I think elsewhere dretd where you were describing some of the differences between chicken and other livestock that has lines of pedigree. I really appreciate that post. In someways, though I find it a bit dismaying...
. Instead of ancestry tracing back... it almost sounds like a show-ring winner in the poultry competitions could be basically anything as long as for that show session it
looks right. There could be a situation where a rooster without even one O gene could come in first place, providing he looks good. I know people in other breeds have experienced some fudging in the pedigree lines, I think someone with paints and quarter-horses was kind of saying anything goes...at times in their showing world...way back when we were discussing a pedigree database for chickens... But seems a bit like a chicken could be more of a "painting in the pen" than a long history of successful breeding of the same breed. (Especially with cockerels, because they pass genetics along but there is no egg there to proof what he is. ) IT is more of a point-in-time than of a linear progression for the breed.
Now, I'm exaggerating a bit here to make the point, but perhaps that is one of the reasons that the U.K. has some troublesome birds that are called CLs and lack a lot of the traits. Someone gets hatching eggs in good faith, from even a prize-winning rooster in the pairing - and whoops - a different egg color shows up -- thinking here of olive since it is accepted in the UK.
Just seems so strange an approach to my mind - coming from the perspective of registered cattle.
Contrast with that - some people who specialize in a breed, such as --- well, name any breed - Barred Rocks, Marans, RIR..etc. - will say .."from 'Mary Smith's line" or some name of repute. That would be the type of consistent flock that produces certain characteristics that a prospective chicken buyer would be looking for. And that would probably have the long-term perspective that I am more used to in the world of registered livestock.