I will have to check but the hens I am sure are different. Crele old english and crele leghorn hens are more barred.
Oh I can look those up in the APA SOP and compare. Thank you!
There are two breeds that have been accepted into the APA SOP that have a Crele color variety: OEG (1996) and OEGB (1976). The APA has not recognized the Crele Leghorn as a variety by the printing of the latest (2010) printing. (unless I am missing one--please do correct me if I am wrong)
Here is what the two varieties listed have to say about the female color:
OEGB (pg 231) (excerpt)
Hackle

ale golden, with irregular mottling of greyish brown
Back: Dark slaty grayish brown, with indistinct lighter greyish barring
Wings: Shoulders, Fronts, Bows same as back
Body: Pale grey with surface color gradually blending into that of back and wings
[DQ's listed are 2 or more solid white feathers or solid black feathers in the tail, primaries or secondaries, Defects: lacing in any section of the plumage, white male sickles, one solid white primary wing feather Note: Special attention should be given to brightness of barring over whether or not a specimen appears lighter of darker than desired.]
OEG (pg 184): There is no variety description for Crele other than to say " In addition to Black, BBR, Spangled...Self Blue OEG, the following varieties are recognized. Brown Red,Golden Duckwing, Silver Duckwing, Red Pile. White, Crele" Then goes on to say "COLOR descriptions--same as for corresponding variety of Modern Games except for beak and shank color"--but the hitch here is that the Modern Game does not list a Crele color variety so there is in fact no written color description for the OEG Crele variety in the SOP.
Gold Legbar from the PCGB BPS 1971 edition (pg 198)
"Plumage female: Hackle pale gold, marked with black bars. Breast salmon, clearly defined. Body dark smoky or slaty grey-brown with indistinct broad soft barrings, the individual feather shaft and slightly paler edging. Wings dark grey-brown. Tail grey-black with slight indication of lighter broad bars." That's it.
The APA does not define Crele at all. Both the OEGB and the Gold Legbar standard calls for similar body/back markings on the female: dark slaty grayish brown with indistinct lighter greyish barring vs dark smoky or slaty grey-brown with indistinct broad soft barring. They both use the words indistinct barring. Curiously, the OEGB doesn't talk about barring on the body at all, just the back and parts of the wings.
Looking at the differences between the OEGB and the Gold Legbar, I think that they are both genetically Crele colorations, but that the emphasis in the OEGB is for an even barring and they do not want lacing at all. The Gold Legbar actually specifies a slightly paler edging and shafting. It confuses me that the OEGB lists a mottled not a barred hackle. Could it be that perhaps the Gold Legbar is choosing characteristics that will make it easier to autosex the chicks whereas the OEGB doesn't care about autosexing and is looking for exhibition characteristics?
Since there is only one SOP on record that says its Crele, I am not sure we can use that one example as a hard and fast rule about what a Crele is supposed to look like in general, just what an OEGB Crele is supposed to look like.
I do wonder now about the CL pullets that I have seen pictures of posted that show quite a lot of light spots on the back and body. I think that the conclusion was that the spots were atypical, but now I wonder if this is one manifestation of the Crele pattern and it simply indicates that the birds are more crisply barred as in the OEGB?