Quote:
4. None of the Above
It is no more beyond the scope of the federal government than is Social Security, Medicare or any other federal program. It will go through the same process as any other bill. First it's written, "discussed" and voted on by the legislative branch, which is comprised of elected representatives from all states (both the House and the Senate). If it makes it through that process, it can be either signed and made into law or vetoed by the elected President (Executive branch). It can be challenged in the Judicial branch for constitutionality, eventually making its way up to the Supreme court. They will ultimately decide its constitutionality. Balance of power. The founding fathers knew what they were doing in creating a system with checks and balances. They also left room for growth, knowing that new issues would come up through the years, and gave us a system for dealing with those issues. Health care falls into that category.
If it's unconstitutional, it will end up in the Supreme Court, where they have a deep understanding of constitutional law. It's what they are there for.
They had health care issues in the 1700's. Benjamin Franklin was crippled by pain and disease. He didn't take from his neighbors to eradicate his problems.
"It is no more beyond the scope of the federal government than is Social Security, Medicare or any other federal program."
True. Those are illegal and worthless, too. But just because we have those doesn't mean we should have more. That doesn't make sense. That's like saying "Well, a few years ago, some guys stole a t.v. and stereo from my neighbor. I may as well take his lawnmower."
Look, there aren't enough rich people to pay for us to have utopia. And making them less rich will not make me less poor. We need to get over the class envy and wipe our own tushes. I hope there will always be rich people so my husband will always have a job.