Crime and the economy
- Thread starter I have WHAT in my yard?
- Start date
So true. That is called socialism, and that is not what this country is about. We have always had hardships to endure as Americans. We have always turned to family and friends. To expect the government to make your life better for you in any way besides national defense is unrealistic and wrong. And, frankly, it's selfish to make everyone give up their freedom just so you don't get a large bill in the mail from some doctor. I'm sorry if you get those bills, I truly am, because I've gotten them and I know the dread and worrying. But large bills sometimes happen, divorce sometimes happens, death sometimes happens, and pure joy sometimes happens. If we want to live in a world where there are no lows, no hardships, then we will live in a world where there are no highs, no triumphs.
Anyone who trusts the government either doesn't know their history, or they choose to ignore it because they stand to gain something. But the more you gain in little perks, the more you lose.
Who was it that said that the government that has the power to give you everything, has the power to take away everything.
May America always be recognizable as America. I love my country..
Anyone who trusts the government either doesn't know their history, or they choose to ignore it because they stand to gain something. But the more you gain in little perks, the more you lose.
Who was it that said that the government that has the power to give you everything, has the power to take away everything.
May America always be recognizable as America. I love my country..
So far I haven't heard any mention of free health care. This coverage will not be free. It will be reasonably priced. What is wrong with reasonably priced? Of course they could effect the same change by better regulating the insurance industry. Then the same people saying the only thing the gov should do is send kids off to die defending our country will say no regulation, bad, bad. Instead health insurance companies should be allowed to make ridiculous profits on your health. Self employed should do without health care. People should do a little reading. Get some facts instead of just reading op ed pieces by right wingers.
Alas it doesn't really matter. Health care is going to become a part of our life . It is badly needed. There are a lot of people that don't have the money to pay for health insurance in it's current form. It needs to be made affordable for everyone. Hate to ask this but WWJD? The JC I learned about would have been appalled to know that it was possible for everybody to get health care, but those that had it were to selfish to let others have it. JMO folks.
Alas it doesn't really matter. Health care is going to become a part of our life . It is badly needed. There are a lot of people that don't have the money to pay for health insurance in it's current form. It needs to be made affordable for everyone. Hate to ask this but WWJD? The JC I learned about would have been appalled to know that it was possible for everybody to get health care, but those that had it were to selfish to let others have it. JMO folks.
Well, so far, complete strangers have told me I'm uneducated, right-wing, gullible, and biased. But none of those very same people has acknowledged the very basic point that this health care bill is unconstitutional. Not one of you have explained to me why it is more important that we do this than to abide by the law of the land, the constitution. It is one of three things:
1. You have an agenda and the constitution gets in your way,
or
2. You haven't read the constitution and don't understand how this country is supposed to work,
or
3. You don't care.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." - Article 5 of The Bill of Rights, as provided in the First Ten Amendments to the Constitution of the United States
I don't see why this is something that is even being argued about. Well, yes, I do.
1. You have an agenda and the constitution gets in your way,
or
2. You haven't read the constitution and don't understand how this country is supposed to work,
or
3. You don't care.
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." - Article 5 of The Bill of Rights, as provided in the First Ten Amendments to the Constitution of the United States
I don't see why this is something that is even being argued about. Well, yes, I do.
Last edited:
Quote:
4. None of the Above
It is no more beyond the scope of the federal government than is Social Security, Medicare or any other federal program. It will go through the same process as any other bill. First it's written, "discussed" and voted on by the legislative branch, which is comprised of elected representatives from all states (both the House and the Senate). If it makes it through that process, it can be either signed and made into law or vetoed by the elected President (Executive branch). It can be challenged in the Judicial branch for constitutionality, eventually making its way up to the Supreme court. They will ultimately decide its constitutionality. Balance of power. The founding fathers knew what they were doing in creating a system with checks and balances. They also left room for growth, knowing that new issues would come up through the years, and gave us a system for dealing with those issues. Health care falls into that category.
If it's unconstitutional, it will end up in the Supreme Court, where they have a deep understanding of constitutional law. It's what they are there for.
4. None of the Above
It is no more beyond the scope of the federal government than is Social Security, Medicare or any other federal program. It will go through the same process as any other bill. First it's written, "discussed" and voted on by the legislative branch, which is comprised of elected representatives from all states (both the House and the Senate). If it makes it through that process, it can be either signed and made into law or vetoed by the elected President (Executive branch). It can be challenged in the Judicial branch for constitutionality, eventually making its way up to the Supreme court. They will ultimately decide its constitutionality. Balance of power. The founding fathers knew what they were doing in creating a system with checks and balances. They also left room for growth, knowing that new issues would come up through the years, and gave us a system for dealing with those issues. Health care falls into that category.
If it's unconstitutional, it will end up in the Supreme Court, where they have a deep understanding of constitutional law. It's what they are there for.
yeah but our elected representatives wont listen to us cause they say they know whats best for us...
when they decided to do the first bailout everyone called and email thier elected representatives and what did the elected representatives do well they did what they thought was best for us instead of listing to us...
I love my country but I dont trust my goverment......
when they decided to do the first bailout everyone called and email thier elected representatives and what did the elected representatives do well they did what they thought was best for us instead of listing to us...
I love my country but I dont trust my goverment......
Wow, guys... How did this go from "crime and the economy" to "health care"?
You guys are doing fine with the discussion, though.
Nice job.
You guys are doing fine with the discussion, though.
So those of you ranting about the "deadbeats", let me get this clear, do you believe that medical care is a product and if you cannot afford it, you should not have access?
I have a problem with the folks that will deny routine care due to costs, but "of course" would never deny emergency care. How do you think these poor people end up in the ER? They put off seeking help until the last minute, their last minute.
I see the healthcare situation in terms of there being five people. Two are swilling champagne & eating cake (Think, unnecessary MRIs and end of life heroics): Expensive & not good for them. Two are eating well: Good for them. One is starving: No food, gonna die. Please do not tell me that weaning the first two off the champagne & cake in order to feed the starving one is UnAmerican. I think we can be smart and compassionate. Please do not talk to me about "rationing". The crooks that run the insurance companies ration people right into their graves.
I have a problem with the folks that will deny routine care due to costs, but "of course" would never deny emergency care. How do you think these poor people end up in the ER? They put off seeking help until the last minute, their last minute.
I see the healthcare situation in terms of there being five people. Two are swilling champagne & eating cake (Think, unnecessary MRIs and end of life heroics): Expensive & not good for them. Two are eating well: Good for them. One is starving: No food, gonna die. Please do not tell me that weaning the first two off the champagne & cake in order to feed the starving one is UnAmerican. I think we can be smart and compassionate. Please do not talk to me about "rationing". The crooks that run the insurance companies ration people right into their graves.
Quote:
Let me give you an example of the problem. I personally know a woman that is self employed and has a daughter. A lot of her money is "under the table." She cleans houses for a living. She has a newer truck. She has a nice horse trailer. She has horses and a dog. She has a cell phone. She has internet serice. She has cable TV. She has no insurance. We went on vacation last year and she and her daughter went on the same trailriding trip we did. The cost of the fuel for her to go on the trip was at least $450. The campsite for a week was another $150. The woman is not destitute. She can afford health insurance. While we were camping and sitting around the fire she made the comment that she can't afford health insurance. She also said she didn't need it anyway because she could just walk into any hospital and get whatever she or her daughter needed. In Nebraska there are programs that a parent can use to get very cheap health insurance for kids. She claims to be unable to afford the $40 a month to buy her kid health insurance. She also just had very expensive surgery that I'm sure the hospital will never see a dime for.
Also, when my husband was looking for a job recently he ended up with a couple of offers. One had health insurance, one didn't. The one with health insurance paid $2 less per hour. He took the job with insurance. If another guy chooses the job with higher pay and no insurance why should he have a right to demand that everybody else be taxed more to support him.
When I talk about dead beats, I'm not talking about somebody that worked and paid their whole life and was stricken with some expensive to treat disease. I'm talking about the dead weight that can't prioritize and expects the government to take care of them.
It's pretty arrogant to think that working class people that have paid into the system all of their lives are sitting around eating cake and swilling champagne just because they complain about people that won't work and won't give up luxuries like cell phones, cable tv and internet service for the sake of their own healthcare. Like I said before, I don't think anybody minds helping the person that worked and paid in all of their lives. But the whole nanny state thing is becoming too oppressive and costly because of the dead weight. Yes, if the dead weight would go away or reform itself, we could afford to help the guy that worked hard and needed a hand.
At my house there is no cake or champagne. It all got taken away in taxes to support the dead weight.
Let me give you an example of the problem. I personally know a woman that is self employed and has a daughter. A lot of her money is "under the table." She cleans houses for a living. She has a newer truck. She has a nice horse trailer. She has horses and a dog. She has a cell phone. She has internet serice. She has cable TV. She has no insurance. We went on vacation last year and she and her daughter went on the same trailriding trip we did. The cost of the fuel for her to go on the trip was at least $450. The campsite for a week was another $150. The woman is not destitute. She can afford health insurance. While we were camping and sitting around the fire she made the comment that she can't afford health insurance. She also said she didn't need it anyway because she could just walk into any hospital and get whatever she or her daughter needed. In Nebraska there are programs that a parent can use to get very cheap health insurance for kids. She claims to be unable to afford the $40 a month to buy her kid health insurance. She also just had very expensive surgery that I'm sure the hospital will never see a dime for.
Also, when my husband was looking for a job recently he ended up with a couple of offers. One had health insurance, one didn't. The one with health insurance paid $2 less per hour. He took the job with insurance. If another guy chooses the job with higher pay and no insurance why should he have a right to demand that everybody else be taxed more to support him.
When I talk about dead beats, I'm not talking about somebody that worked and paid their whole life and was stricken with some expensive to treat disease. I'm talking about the dead weight that can't prioritize and expects the government to take care of them.
It's pretty arrogant to think that working class people that have paid into the system all of their lives are sitting around eating cake and swilling champagne just because they complain about people that won't work and won't give up luxuries like cell phones, cable tv and internet service for the sake of their own healthcare. Like I said before, I don't think anybody minds helping the person that worked and paid in all of their lives. But the whole nanny state thing is becoming too oppressive and costly because of the dead weight. Yes, if the dead weight would go away or reform itself, we could afford to help the guy that worked hard and needed a hand.
At my house there is no cake or champagne. It all got taken away in taxes to support the dead weight.
Similar threads
New posts New threads Active threads
-
Latest threads
-
-
Anyone near Quitman, AR with chicks or hens?- Started by Witchychickmama
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Dry skin or fungal infection?
- Started by Flock n Dock
- Replies: 2
-
-
Threads with more replies in the last 15 days
-
Question of the Day - Friday, February 13th, 2026- Started by casportpony
- Replies: 93
-
-
-
-
-
