BoogieWight
Chirping
- Oct 23, 2020
- 84
- 240
- 81
Sorry for the late response. I attached two pictures with a very much retired bird that pretty much has his own space on the yard. A fella died and his wife didn't want to take care if his birds so I bought some if them. This one normally only has only two hens that stay with him off and on throughout the day. A lot of the young birds tend to stay in his area and actually move to his tree after the hens ditch them. I won't lie to you and say that his spot wasn't hard earned especially at his old age, cause it was hard to just let it happen sometimes. This is a prime example of a "proven" game that has learned his place and functions well in it. He ain't the only one, but I do keep that scenario to a minimum for obvious reasons.One difficulty I have as I research and learn about gamefowl is finding accurate information that’s consistent, where experienced gamefowl people often have their own opinions on things that often conflict with each other and neither opinion can be said to not be based on experience. Case and point, some gamefowl people won’t consider a bird “game” if it will tolerate another male at any time past chickhood. In which case the “game” response is caused by artificial selection that increases aggression beyond what would be found in nature. If you offer examples of birds behaving differently, the response is “well those birds must be dunghills.” Others insist that a bird can be a “real” gamefowl and still set up a degree of a natural pecking order, where a mature cock will keep order and tolerate stags until they’re mature, at which time they may become challengers. Or when new mature bird is dropped into the mix. In that scenerio, the “game” response is due to a fight between unknown strangers in what in nature would amount to an interloper invading a new territory. Thus, the cock pit would be simply a simulation of what’s found in nature when two wild junglefowl clash over hens or territory and both are similarly matched, and “game” is more of a preservation of the wild traits with artificial selection only modifying the trait slightly.
I’ve had both definitions thrown at me over the last couple of years and each person will fight for however they define “game” about as fierce as the roosters themselves.
The wild definition seems to make more sense to me, and yet I can’t rule out that decades of tie cord raising hasn’t modified gamefowl from what they were 150 years ago. All I know is my family used to free range their gamefowl on about 100 acres of Florida woods and the brood cocks would set up territories in the woods and avoided each other. My great grandfather and great uncle collected stags and cocks for fighting off the woods free rangers, but only my great uncle is alive and I suppose because I’m a part of “The State” in my profession he won’t give me the time of day to give me any info about the family birds. I actually laid all of this out in the JF thread.
I only say all of that to say, what you’re describing is the sort of nature I’m looking for. Birds that will set up territories and space themselves out and otherwise tolerate each other if they know one another. If they trigger once in a while and kill each other, that’s fine. I’m all for them killing a stranger on sight. They just need to be able to allow more than one mature rooster or bullstag to live around the area so the homestead isn’t left wanting if the dominant rooster dies.
I will say that in my experience once a game rooster is broken they take a lot longer than other birds to get their confidence back. It can seem like a long process, but if they do end up finding a place they have a freedom that most chickens will never experience. Its a win for them and a win for me.
Attachments
Last edited: