I am attaching two links here to a story that started last November. First, please let me say that I am not against pit bull type dogs. That being said, I would also like to say that breeds like this need owners who know how to properly raise and socialize them. The owners in this story don't sound qualified to have any dogs, and I am not sure that they should have children, either.
http://www.minotdailynews.com/page/...tack-victim-remains-in-hospital.html?nav=5010
http://www.minotdailynews.com/page/content.detail/id/551071.html
A few points in this story that strike me as odd... the victim was there to babysit the dog owners child. But the dogs were closed in a room with the child that she was supposed to be babysitting, and she was told to not open the door. Does this make any sense at all? Babysit my child but you can't see her or do anything to take care of her? Really?
Then there was a town meeting because the dog owners have another dog that is the same type as the dogs that attacked, but now they want to call it a 'service dog' for their daughter. And the dog owner said that the victim is 'alive and well' (I guess never mind that she is still facing more skin grafts and reconstructive surgery).
It's people like this that give those types of dog a bad reputation. Irresponsible with not only the dogs, but with their child as well. (Would you leave your child in the care of another person, but have that person not be able to take care of your child without getting mauled - in front of the child?) This story just bothers me on so many levels...
Edited to change the title...
http://www.minotdailynews.com/page/...tack-victim-remains-in-hospital.html?nav=5010
http://www.minotdailynews.com/page/content.detail/id/551071.html
A few points in this story that strike me as odd... the victim was there to babysit the dog owners child. But the dogs were closed in a room with the child that she was supposed to be babysitting, and she was told to not open the door. Does this make any sense at all? Babysit my child but you can't see her or do anything to take care of her? Really?
Then there was a town meeting because the dog owners have another dog that is the same type as the dogs that attacked, but now they want to call it a 'service dog' for their daughter. And the dog owner said that the victim is 'alive and well' (I guess never mind that she is still facing more skin grafts and reconstructive surgery).
It's people like this that give those types of dog a bad reputation. Irresponsible with not only the dogs, but with their child as well. (Would you leave your child in the care of another person, but have that person not be able to take care of your child without getting mauled - in front of the child?) This story just bothers me on so many levels...
Edited to change the title...
Last edited: