Well, I read the article. Here are some of my thoughts.
"A lot of veterinarians give misleading information to get you to keep vaccinating your dog regularly."
As a person that works in the Veterinary field, I guess I just kind of think, well, unvaccinated animals get sick.
Do I believe/agree that you can over vaccinate and we could do more to lessen the amount of vaccines given? Certainly. That's why it's called
practicing medicine, you can always improve and do better.
In my years of working at a small animal practice, I've never seen a pet die from a vaccine. I would never say that it couldn't happen. All vaccines have risk (even for humans).
Now, I have seen puppies die from Parvo, cats from distemper and dogs die from Lyme (after it has affected the kidneys).
No vaccine is 100% effective, but it's a very good precaution.
"Some vets charge an exorbitant amount for titers (perhaps because they really don’t want to do them)"
I'll admit, I rolled my eyes at that statement. It falls into the "vets just want to take your money!" mindset.
It costs money to send a blood sample to a special lab (like Veterinary college) to be analyzed. It costs money to ship it same day through UPS in a chilled package. It costs money to pay the technician to draw the blood and prepare it for testing.
It's quite silly to suggest that the "high" price stems from pure laziness or a disinterest in what's best for a pet's health. Which I feel is sort of what the author is implying.
All in all, it's not a bad article, there's some really good points, but sentences like above can detract from the science and cloud an objective view.
In the end, you must do what's best for your pet and what you feel is right for them.
