- Jan 25, 2008
- 3,832
- 41
- 221
I wonder if maybe it's for safety reasons?
It's one thing to ward off a dog attack on land, but in the water? Some dogs panic in water and try to use people as a flotation device and end up scratching people. Or worse, could you imagine some irresponsible dog owner letting their large 100lb dog swim and then it panicks for whatever reason and tries to climb on top of a child?
I would think it was more safety reasons that cleanliness. But then again, how often do you see "public authorities" blaming waterfowl for fouling up public water? There was an article I read the other day, where public authorities had to prohibited swimming in a public lake because the bacteria "from the geese and ducks" had gotten too high.
Some rules have real purpose, and some rules only have reasoning.
It's one thing to ward off a dog attack on land, but in the water? Some dogs panic in water and try to use people as a flotation device and end up scratching people. Or worse, could you imagine some irresponsible dog owner letting their large 100lb dog swim and then it panicks for whatever reason and tries to climb on top of a child?
I would think it was more safety reasons that cleanliness. But then again, how often do you see "public authorities" blaming waterfowl for fouling up public water? There was an article I read the other day, where public authorities had to prohibited swimming in a public lake because the bacteria "from the geese and ducks" had gotten too high.
Some rules have real purpose, and some rules only have reasoning.