Not sure if they sell the flags here, but this project was the one that really started re-popularlizing this flag...
http://www.the912project.com/
http://www.the912project.com/
Don't tread on me! - Replacing old Glory?
- Thread starter Boyd
- Start date
- Status
Quote:
Quote:
It's not polite to make faces.
It's not polite to make faces.
Last edited:
- Jul 30, 2009
- 2,321
- 15
- 181
Amazon has an excellent selection.
I also stand for what the constitution was written as, not for how its been reinterpreted rewritten and amended.
I also stand for what the constitution was written as, not for how its been reinterpreted rewritten and amended.
Quote:
Not at all. Following the constitution should never entail having "different ideas about what supporting it means". It's written there, in black and white, and leaves nothing to interpretation. Either you support following the constitution as it was written, or you do not. On this, there is no "gray". You dont support the right to free speech, but oppose the right to gun ownership. Even if you do oppose one of the rights listed in the constitution, you would need to have an amendment passed by the public, not the back door politics which are currently tearing the constitution to shreds. So, you support following the constitution to the letter, and changing it in the ONLY way prescribed, or you do not, simple as that. And nearly every person that DOES support the constitution as written and intended, would certainly not be offended by the flag, or the tea parties principles.
Not at all. Following the constitution should never entail having "different ideas about what supporting it means". It's written there, in black and white, and leaves nothing to interpretation. Either you support following the constitution as it was written, or you do not. On this, there is no "gray". You dont support the right to free speech, but oppose the right to gun ownership. Even if you do oppose one of the rights listed in the constitution, you would need to have an amendment passed by the public, not the back door politics which are currently tearing the constitution to shreds. So, you support following the constitution to the letter, and changing it in the ONLY way prescribed, or you do not, simple as that. And nearly every person that DOES support the constitution as written and intended, would certainly not be offended by the flag, or the tea parties principles.
I don't care for the Tea Party or what they want to accomplish.
"The Tea Party Movement Ecosystem is a collection of individuals and self-organizing groups all united in accomplishing a single goal: returning fiscal responsibility and limited government to the United States through the exercise of political activism. It consists of the 1 million plus individuals who attended the 900 tea parties held across the country on April 15, and the millions more who believe in the noble cause of saving our republic from socialism today. Each individual and group within this ecosystem determines where they want to place their focus, and works independently to accomplish their own unique goals, but communicates and collaborates with every other individual and group within the ecosystem, so that we are all moving the ball forward to achieve the objective that unites us all -- returning fiscal responsibility to all levels of government in the United States."
http://www.nationwidechicagoteaparty.com/
"The Tea Party Movement Ecosystem is a collection of individuals and self-organizing groups all united in accomplishing a single goal: returning fiscal responsibility and limited government to the United States through the exercise of political activism. It consists of the 1 million plus individuals who attended the 900 tea parties held across the country on April 15, and the millions more who believe in the noble cause of saving our republic from socialism today. Each individual and group within this ecosystem determines where they want to place their focus, and works independently to accomplish their own unique goals, but communicates and collaborates with every other individual and group within the ecosystem, so that we are all moving the ball forward to achieve the objective that unites us all -- returning fiscal responsibility to all levels of government in the United States."
http://www.nationwidechicagoteaparty.com/
Quote:
Not at all. Following the constitution should never entail having "different ideas about what supporting it means". It's written there, in black and white, and leaves nothing to interpretation. Either you support following the constitution as it was written, or you do not. On this, there is no "gray". You dont support the right to free speech, but oppose the right to gun ownership. Even if you do oppose one of the rights listed in the constitution, you would need to have an amendment passed by the public, not the back door politics which are currently tearing the constitution to shreds. So, you support following the constitution to the letter, and changing it in the ONLY way prescribed, or you do not, simple as that. And nearly every person that DOES support the constitution as written and intended, would certainly not be offended by the flag, or the tea parties principles.
It's 2010. How long ago was the constitution written? And all Americans STILL don't have the rights guaranteed in the constitution. If you're going to be a fundamentalist about it.....
How hypocritical it is to say "don't tread on me" while denying others their rights!
Not at all. Following the constitution should never entail having "different ideas about what supporting it means". It's written there, in black and white, and leaves nothing to interpretation. Either you support following the constitution as it was written, or you do not. On this, there is no "gray". You dont support the right to free speech, but oppose the right to gun ownership. Even if you do oppose one of the rights listed in the constitution, you would need to have an amendment passed by the public, not the back door politics which are currently tearing the constitution to shreds. So, you support following the constitution to the letter, and changing it in the ONLY way prescribed, or you do not, simple as that. And nearly every person that DOES support the constitution as written and intended, would certainly not be offended by the flag, or the tea parties principles.
How hypocritical it is to say "don't tread on me" while denying others their rights!
Quote:
Not at all. Following the constitution should never entail having "different ideas about what supporting it means". It's written there, in black and white, and leaves nothing to interpretation. Either you support following the constitution as it was written, or you do not. On this, there is no "gray". You dont support the right to free speech, but oppose the right to gun ownership. Even if you do oppose one of the rights listed in the constitution, you would need to have an amendment passed by the public, not the back door politics which are currently tearing the constitution to shreds. So, you support following the constitution to the letter, and changing it in the ONLY way prescribed, or you do not, simple as that. And nearly every person that DOES support the constitution as written and intended, would certainly not be offended by the flag, or the tea parties principles.
It's 2010. How long ago was the constitution written? And all Americans STILL don't have the rights guaranteed in the constitution. If you're going to be a fundamentalist about it.....
How hypocritical it is to say "don't tread on me" while denying others their rights!
This!
What burns my toast is the suggestion that because I disagree with the Teabaggers, or aspects of the Right in general, I am unamerican.
Beyond rude, beyond offensive.
Not at all. Following the constitution should never entail having "different ideas about what supporting it means". It's written there, in black and white, and leaves nothing to interpretation. Either you support following the constitution as it was written, or you do not. On this, there is no "gray". You dont support the right to free speech, but oppose the right to gun ownership. Even if you do oppose one of the rights listed in the constitution, you would need to have an amendment passed by the public, not the back door politics which are currently tearing the constitution to shreds. So, you support following the constitution to the letter, and changing it in the ONLY way prescribed, or you do not, simple as that. And nearly every person that DOES support the constitution as written and intended, would certainly not be offended by the flag, or the tea parties principles.
How hypocritical it is to say "don't tread on me" while denying others their rights!
This!
What burns my toast is the suggestion that because I disagree with the Teabaggers, or aspects of the Right in general, I am unamerican.
Beyond rude, beyond offensive.
Quote:
I guess you don't vote then.
I guess you don't vote then.
- Status
New posts New threads Active threads
-
Latest threads
-
-
Cracked beak! Advice wanted!
- Started by CityChickins
- Replies: 0
-
Cellular game/security cameras- Started by RoseHawke
- Replies: 0
-
Hen limping, losing feathers
- Started by cheitz20
- Replies: 0
-
-
-
Threads with more replies in the last 15 days
-
-
-
-
-
Prettiest chicken breeds and plumage color- Started by Beau plus penny
- Replies: 46
-
