Why would the vet recommend using the DiMethox then?
Something doesn't make sense.
Does DiMethox treat other "things" too?
I am not familiar with this stuff at all.
I understand what you are both saying.
If this isn't an avian vet with significant poultry experience, I can imagine him taking a shot in the dark. If one doesn't know the appearance of intestinal pathogens that can populate chickens' bowls, they don't know what they are looking at.
Thanks guys.
Yeah he said he cannot test for anything more nor does he have any suggestions for their symptoms but said he did see a few cocci and that "it probably wouldn't hurt to treat with DiMethox if we want to"
So I still do not know why they're having this continuing issue.
The fact is that almost all poultry - or any other animal with soil access will have some of those Eimeria protozoa in their fecal samples. Having coccidia present doesn't indicate the need for coccidiosis medication. Almost all those animals are already resistant. Unless there is some other extreme stressor, they will never contract coccidiosis, even with oocysts ingested.
Virtually all grazers, browsers and foragers will ingest some oocysts. That doesn't mean they need to be treated with Corid or other coccidiostat. THEY DON'T. If they did, one would have to keep them on Corid their entire lives.
In the last 10 years or so, I have treated chickens for coccidiosis twice but not in the last 5 years. I have not had a case of coccidiosis other than those two instances many years ago. I guarantee, every one of the thousand or so chickens I've had in that time have had some Eimeria oocysts or eggs and protozoa in their fecal samples. But they didn't need to be treated.
I have a friend who was a vet tech at a hospital that treated a lot of poultry. She could always find coccidia in a fecal sample. The birds weren't there for coccidiosis though.
The vet almost always wanted to treat for it but IMHO, it wasn't necessary.