You answered your own question, he doesn't believe it's necessary.Well, if I admit that, then SOMEONE might think we are breaking the rules about having too many households in one house.IF he were to come, and bring... say, a vegetable dish, we would still be under the "allowed" number of people. Better than what the governor just got caught doing. But I supposed if the guy making the rules isn't going to follow them, nobody else needs to either.
What I don't get, is if a man makes rules that he believes are absolutely necessary to save people from spreading a dangerous disease, and that it is so urgent and important to have these rules in place that he can bypass the constitutional congressional lawmaking process and make the laws himself... that it is essential that all of this happen in order to SAVE LIVES, why did he think it was okay for he and his wife to not follow his own rules? He must not actually believe it's necessary. So why make the rules?It's a conundrum.
He and his wife attended a sit down dinner with 12 or so other people he was unrelated to. No one was wearing masks in the pictures that some sneaky person took of the dinner party. He's been lecturing the entire state about NOT doing this very thing.
Which leads to the next question. What is his motivation for making the rules that he doesn't really believe are necessary?
And a couple of the states top medical people were there.
What are you eating. I am eating the last of the Thai chicken curry I made 2 nights ago. It's spicy!
One of those dinners they bring. Wish I hadnt. I stopped half way because I realized I wasnt hungry .
