Granny's gone and done it again

Well, if I admit that, then SOMEONE might think we are breaking the rules about having too many households in one house. :rolleyes: IF he were to come, and bring... say, a vegetable dish, we would still be under the "allowed" number of people. Better than what the governor just got caught doing. But I supposed if the guy making the rules isn't going to follow them, nobody else needs to either.

What I don't get, is if a man makes rules that he believes are absolutely necessary to save people from spreading a dangerous disease, and that it is so urgent and important to have these rules in place that he can bypass the constitutional congressional lawmaking process and make the laws himself... that it is essential that all of this happen in order to SAVE LIVES, why did he think it was okay for he and his wife to not follow his own rules? He must not actually believe it's necessary. So why make the rules? :idunno It's a conundrum.
You answered your own question, he doesn't believe it's necessary.
 
What did your Governor do exactly?
He and his wife attended a sit down dinner with 12 or so other people he was unrelated to. No one was wearing masks in the pictures that some sneaky person took of the dinner party. He's been lecturing the entire state about NOT doing this very thing.
 
He and his wife attended a sit down dinner with 12 or so other people he was unrelated to. No one was wearing masks in the pictures that some sneaky person took of the dinner party. He's been lecturing the entire state about NOT doing this very thing.
And a couple of the states top medical people were there.
 

New posts New threads Active threads

Back
Top Bottom